As I said this is a stop gap until we get other players in where needed.Can't strongly disagree with any of that, my only question would be how does our current squad fit into that system.
I don't see how you can avoid dropping our best players to fit the above proposed systems and still have a good balance to the team.
Some interesting ideas there but Ogogo and Dunne together there sitting in front of the back four is quite some luxury. Going to give a whole new meaning to the verb 'sitting'. You need more dynamism that they can offer. Sign a new player to play next to Ferguson in those positions and that might be a way forward.As I said this is a stop gap until we get other players in where needed.
Flinty and I covered this off between us, so this is a kind of joint effort......:
Starting XI
--------------- -Arnold---------------
Howard------ Hobson - Lopata- ------Ralph
------ Agogo --------- Dunne----
-- Walsh------------------ -----Bridge
-----------------Brunt-------------
------------------Dalby--------------
The full backs provide extra width, but do not have to overlap the advance midfielders to deliver crosses into the box.
The holding midfielders do not pas the half way line and give licence for the front three midfelders to support Dolby.
Brunt is slightly advanced in the midfield three.
Sorry YB, but this is a totally different tactic from 4-5-1.
SUBS: (Switch personnel depending home/away as required)
Clifford - when fit
Demi
White
Ferguson/Phillips/Gard/Kinali
Rush
Murphy
You’ve literally named 4 defenders, 5 midfielders and a forwardAs I said this is a stop gap until we get other players in where needed.
Flinty and I covered this off between us, so this is a kind of joint effort......:
Starting XI
--------------- -Arnold---------------
Howard------ Hobson - Lopata- ------Ralph
------ Agogo --------- Dunne----
-- Walsh------------------ -----Bridge
-----------------Brunt-------------
------------------Dalby--------------
The full backs provide extra width, but do not have to overlap the advance midfielders to deliver crosses into the box.
The holding midfielders do not pas the half way line and give licence for the front three midfelders to support Dolby.
Brunt is slightly advanced in the midfield three.
Sorry YB, but this is a totally different tactic from 4-5-1.
SUBS: (Switch personnel depending home/away as required)
Clifford - when fit
Demi
White
Ferguson/Phillips/Gard/Kinali
Rush
Murphy
Totally get your point, but this is a stop gap with the personnel we currently have that I would try, and obviously I am not making that decision thank Gawd, to shore us up and stop losing games, until the recruitment team did their stuff and brought us the dynamic players that I totally agree we do not have at the moment.Some interesting ideas there but Ogogo and Dunne together there sitting in front of the back four is quite some luxury. Going to give a whole new meaning to the verb 'sitting'. You need more dynamism that they can offer. Sign a new player to play next to Ferguson in those positions and that might be a way forward.
No it's not, 'cos a 4-5-1 is a flat midfield covering across the pitch with all the midfield getting up and down the park.You’ve literally named 4 defenders, 5 midfielders and a forward
Of course it’s a form of 4-5-1.
Yes I know, also happens when young players like Dru or Charlie Sayers make a debut etc.The Directors' Box has had plenty of scouts in for the recent youth cup ties. We are still a source of interest, especially our young players because people know and trust the work the Academy does.
We don't have anyone who can play at a professional standard full stop! Maybe the Sheffield lads but everyone else should be getting up at 8am on a Sunday morning preparing for a 9am kick off!Certainly. We do not have the midfielders capable of playing in a central midfield two. Firstly, most teams play with three in the middle these days, so we're already at a disadvantage. Secondly, we lack players with the energy and physicality to be able to match most opponents. Playing two in the centre of a 4-4-2 would leave us horrendously exposed. Also you'd have to drop Brunt, he is an attacking midfielder and we don't have someone who could adequately cover him enough for him to be an effective force.
We could try and counter it by playing a 'tucked in' winger on one side, but in reality we don't have anyone who can play that role effectively either and it's a difficult role to play. Carl Pettefer did it with some success but we also had Mark Bentley alongside him and that obviously helped. Also a lot more teams played with two central midfielders rather than three back then.
So, we're left with essentially having to play three central midfielders just to compete. So that means either 4-5-1, or 3-5-2 if you absolutely insist on two strikers. Neither of which are acceptable to supporters because 4-4-2 is what most people grew up on and are comfortable with. However, it's being phased out of the modern game.
The issue is we don't look great in a 3-5-2 either, although it is the formation that probably suits the personnel we have best at this moment in time.
It's why the issue of a dominant central midfielder is so important. It would allow us to break free to try new systems.
Unfortunately this is also hard to disagree withuntil we ship some players out and bring better players in you can spend all day and night twiddling with formations but we still are not going to get a regular winning team.
One of Robinson's other recommendations was Kaziah Sterling. I believe he was a little embarrassed by that one!
@StanleyVictorCollymore - if your head of recruitment is playing hard to get and there’s room for another talented fitness coach, we may have a serious contender here.We don't have anyone who can play at a professional standard full stop! Maybe the Sheffield lads but everyone else should be getting up at 8am on a Sunday morning preparing for a 9am kick off!
I would have thought molesley bought in the bournemouth ones?Robinson has played a huge role in almost every loan signing we have made since his arrival, bar the Sheffield United lads…
I would have thought molesley bought in the bournemouth ones?
Listed below (Robinson was appointed on 30th September 2020):Robinson has played a huge role in almost every loan signing we have made since his arrival, bar the Sheffield United lads…
Right gotcha.Anton Robinson was at Bournemouth, in their recruitment department.
Totally get it. I remember blues using 433 with similar players and turning the season around under Steve Thompson. Tony Battersby was the main striker.The problem with 4-3-3 is that the wingers aren't expected to contribute to the defense like a lot of other formations (if they do it's really a 4-5-1 or maybe a 4-2-3-1) which means the full backs don't have any protection. That's not to mention since the wingers are so far up the pitch the full backs have to contribute to attacks, which means if possession is lost in midfield when our full backs were pushing up we could find ourselves short on men at the back.
For a team like Liverpool that's not a big deal because they'll have the lion's share of the possession (rarely losing it in midfield) and their defenders are good enough to deal with problems when they come but for us it means they'd have to deal with a lot of pressure that I'm not convinced our full backs would be able to cope with.
Alex Bass as well.Listed below (Robinson was appointed on 30th September 2020):
James Olayinka (although I remember Mark Molesley credited Ricky Duncan’s contacts with Arsenal for that one)
Reeco Hackett-Fairchild
Tyler Cordner
James Montgomery (emergency loan)
Matt Dennis
Hamzad Kargbo
Benjamin Mbunga Kimpioka
Yeah, Taylor joined in the week before Robinson was announced. As, like Molesley, he’d been working at Bournemouth previously, he’s someone that would’ve been known to him (same with Cordner, of course).Alex Bass as well.
Presume Kyle Taylor missed the cut off by a day or two but Anton Robinson might have been involved with that as well as his appointment and other back office staff seemed to have been announced after he started
tbh other than Sterling, Kargbo and maybe Kimpioka they were all decent enough. Not necessarily great but better than the free agent business like Ranger, Holmes, Hart and Halford - but that’s why they were free agents.