• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

Now the story has died a death after 25 pages re PB

Will anyone on SZ being asking this question to the club,when they next meet,to clarify whether he did or did not and then it canbe put finally be wrapped up ad PB can hopefully getting on with the new season (Thats if he has not gone to another club):winking:

UTS
 
Now the story has died a death after 25 pages re PB

Will anyone on SZ being asking this question to the club,when they next meet,to clarify whether he did or did not and then it canbe put finally be wrapped up ad PB can hopefully getting on with the new season (Thats if he has not gone to another club):winking:



UTS

Interesting question. They should...seeing as they brought it to the SZ masses! I doubt they will though.
 
We raised the question of whether there was an embargo and the club denied it. Why would they answer on this one ?
 
So why go to the meetings if they are holding back answers,whats the point?

It seems The Trust from certain quarters on this site are given a bashing for not showing balls so what is SZ role in going,especially when it knows something that maybe a rumour though from a very good source that cannot be revealed.
Yet has caused so much attention and divided opinions on a manager, that has not and seems willnot be given time by some fans.

Uts
 
On matters that really count, like finances and embargos we should be knocking on the door looking for answers and explanations, but there isnt a lot of point demanding answers to this, he either applied for the job, or he didnt. Either way he is still here.

Im sure McNasty can and will raise it and the next liason meeting anyway.
 
Yet you said the embargo was denied by them,so why go if things are with held

And if they are unhappy with the questions being asked, then perhaps it is a time to stay an independant site,and let The Trust carry on its good work.
 
On matters that really count, like finances and embargos we should be knocking on the door looking for answers and explanations, but there isnt a lot of point demanding answers to this, he either applied for the job, or he didnt. Either way he is still here.

Im sure McNasty can and will raise it and the next liason meeting anyway.

I think someone should ask the question. Definitely. Whether it's answered with a 'we don't comment on rumours' rebuff is another matter entirely. For me, it's a fair question.
 
Yet you said the embargo was denied by them,so why go if things are with held

And if they are unhappy with the questions being asked, then perhaps it is a time to stay an independant site,and let The Trust carry on its good work.

The site is independant, but there is no harm in meeting with the club and the Trust and surely its a good thing. The club will not answer all questions, that doesnt mean we shouldnt be asking them when needs dictate.

I think someone should ask the question. Definitely. Whether it's answered with a 'we don't comment on rumours' rebuff is another matter entirely. For me, it's a fair question.

Indeed.

I actually have asked the question by email and so far have had no reply. McNasty will be in a position to ask face to face and at least get a response.
 
I have had correspondence with the club over the rumour I started this thread with. I havent been asked to remove the thread so I can only assume the club do not object to it's existence .
 
I have had correspondence with the club over the rumour I started this thread with. I havent been asked to remove the thread so I can only assume the club do not object to it's existence .

Because it is not true or because it is true? That is the question...

Did they contact you?
 
Whether he (Brown) has or has not applied for other jobs changes nothing for me.

25 pages, over 300 comments and over 17,000 views. Wow -more cricket please ........ :'(
 

ShrimperZone Sponsors

FFM MSPFX Foreign Exchange Services
Estuary MFF2
Zone Advertisers Zone Advertisers

ShrimperZone - SUFC Player Sponsorship

Southend United Away Travel


All At Sea Fanzine


Back
Top