overseas shrimper
Life President⭐🦐
Bull crap. IMO, the club needs to take any money coming its way.[b said:Quote[/b] (nnatt76 @ Jan. 11 2005,14:04)]I (we) dont want your bloody money...
Bull crap. IMO, the club needs to take any money coming its way.[b said:Quote[/b] (nnatt76 @ Jan. 11 2005,14:04)]I (we) dont want your bloody money...
Exactly![b said:Quote[/b] (overseas shrimper @ Jan. 11 2005,17:24)]Bull crap. IMO, the club needs to take any money coming its way.[b said:Quote[/b] (nnatt76 @ Jan. 11 2005,14:04)]I (we) dont want your bloody money...
What a load of crap! Does it REALLY matter who comes and pays £16 into the club's funds and what they fecking wear? No, it doesn't. One could apply the same principle to the wearing of burberry and its association with hooliganism ...[b said:Quote[/b] (nnatt76 @ Jan. 11 2005,13:04)]On another note if you are bringing friends and familly to watch football at the hall for F*cks sake make sure they take off any West ham shirts and scarfs...it makes my blood boil to see these tight fisted hammers comming down to watch us with the excuse that you cant get ticklets for the hammers and they just want to watch a game of football......I (we) dont want your bloody money stop coming to watch us and save ya cash to watch your own F*@@~@ team.
With respect mate - total b******s! We achieved what we did despite him not because of him and his bullish and down right arrogant attitude caused a few die-hard fans to walk away from the club and cost us many times more in potential future fans.[b said:Quote[/b] (Technician @ Jan. 11 2005,11:39)]I think there are one or two posts on here about Vic Jobson that should not have been written.
Irrespective of what he got up to when he was alive, he is no longer here to defend himself, but members of his family are... where are the moderators, when you need them?
Whilst I never wished any actual harm to Vic I must confess that during "his silence" I, and quite a few others, found myself in the west stand toilets.[b said:Quote[/b] (Ron Manager @ Jan. 11 2005,19:41)]With respect mate - total b******s! We achieved what we did despite him not because of him and his bullish and down right arrogant attitude caused a few die-hard fans to walk away from the club and cost us many times more in potential future fans.[b said:Quote[/b] (Technician @ Jan. 11 2005,11:39)]I think there are one or two posts on here about Vic Jobson that should not have been written.
Irrespective of what he got up to when he was alive, he is no longer here to defend himself, but members of his family are... where are the moderators, when you need them?
The fact that his is the only minutes silence I can recall not being respected at Roots Hall says a lot about the man - I and many other Southend fans were not unhappy to hear of his death. If that sounds cold-hearted then so be it!
[b said:Quote[/b] ]Whilst I never wished any actual harm to Vic I must confess that during "his silence" I, and quite a few others, found myself in the west stand toilets.
[b said:Quote[/b] ] I, and quite a few others, found myself in the west stand toilets.
Well, a boy's got to keep warm somehow![b said:Quote[/b] (BoyWonder2 @ Jan. 11 2005,22:03)][b said:Quote[/b] ] I, and quite a few others, found myself in the west stand toilets.
That sounds a bit suspect to me....
Not least because it's impossible to libel the dead. Unfortunately for dead people, you can say what you like about them and they can't sue you... because they're dead![b said:Quote[/b] (Napster @ Jan. 11 2005,11:43)]You called?
Nothing untrue or defamatory has been posted, to my knowledge.
But you can be sued for blasphemy which presumably equates to defamation of Jesus Christ even though he is dead/never existed in the first place depending on your point of view.[b said:Quote[/b] (Matt the Shrimp @ Jan. 12 2005,12:19)]Not least because it's impossible to libel the dead. Unfortunately for dead people, you can say what you like about them and they can't sue you... because they're dead![b said:Quote[/b] (Napster @ Jan. 11 2005,11:43)]You called?
Nothing untrue or defamatory has been posted, to my knowledge.
Of course, you need to be careful not to libel the estate (e.g. it may well be libellous to say "VJ's money came from his pimping & drug-running") - since the estate might then suffer loss of reputation, in that you might be suggesting that the assets within the estate had been obtained illegally.
However, even if it was untrue (e.g. "VJ was a coke-snorting whorer"), VJ cannot sue you for damages for libel / defamation, because he's dead - and that right to protect himself against defamation of his own character dies with him.
That's why it's good to have a lawyer as a mod![b said:Quote[/b] (Matt the Shrimp @ Jan. 12 2005,12:19)]Not least because it's impossible to libel the dead. Unfortunately for dead people, you can say what you like about them and they can't sue you... because they're dead![b said:Quote[/b] (Napster @ Jan. 11 2005,11:43)]You called?
Nothing untrue or defamatory has been posted, to my knowledge.
Of course, you need to be careful not to libel the estate (e.g. it may well be libellous to say "VJ's money came from his pimping & drug-running") - since the estate might then suffer loss of reputation, in that you might be suggesting that the assets within the estate had been obtained illegally.
However, even if it was untrue (e.g. "VJ was a coke-snorting whorer"), VJ cannot sue you for damages for libel / defamation, because he's dead - and that right to protect himself against defamation of his own character dies with him.
Because (I think) it's effectively defamation of the Monarch, since the Queen is the church in England & Wales...[b said:Quote[/b] (Mad Cyril @ Jan. 12 2005,12:23)]But you can be sued for blasphemy which presumably equates to defamation of Jesus Christ even though he is dead/never existed in the first place depending on your point of view.[b said:Quote[/b] (Matt the Shrimp @ Jan. 12 2005,12:19)]Not least because it's impossible to libel the dead. Unfortunately for dead people, you can say what you like about them and they can't sue you... because they're dead![b said:Quote[/b] (Napster @ Jan. 11 2005,11:43)]You called?
Nothing untrue or defamatory has been posted, to my knowledge.
Of course, you need to be careful not to libel the estate (e.g. it may well be libellous to say "VJ's money came from his pimping & drug-running") - since the estate might then suffer loss of reputation, in that you might be suggesting that the assets within the estate had been obtained illegally.
However, even if it was untrue (e.g. "VJ was a coke-snorting whorer"), VJ cannot sue you for damages for libel / defamation, because he's dead - and that right to protect himself against defamation of his own character dies with him.
I couldn't possibly comment...[b said:Quote[/b] (Ron Manager @ Jan. 12 2005,12:23)]So, Matt, if I say 'Vic Jobson looked like Jabba the Hut but had fewer manners' it's OK?
I would guess ORM thinks we would struggle in Div 3.[b said:Quote[/b] (Matt the Shrimp @ Jan. 12 2005,12:33)]Not sure I "get" how gates would reduce if we went up next season.
Ah, I see that point.[b said:Quote[/b] (Hong Kong Blue @ Jan. 12 2005,15:21)]I would guess ORM thinks we would struggle in Div 3.[b said:Quote[/b] (Matt the Shrimp @ Jan. 12 2005,12:33)]Not sure I "get" how gates would reduce if we went up next season.
Its the old argument, you are better off fighting for promotion in the 4th, than fighting off relegation from the 3rd. Personally I think there is an element of truth in it.