• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

Irate Ian - Life Ban!

Status
Not open for further replies.
So Private Messages aren't Private?

Also, when banning someone, shouldn't they really be told why they've been banned as opposed to just "persistent trouble making".

As for the rules of this site, I stated in another topic "Locking threads", that actually the rules aren't clear and that the FAQ which is a useful reference point is pretty much hidden away.

mate its a ****ing website! its not like i have been banned. then there would be an outcry
 
Private Messages are private until the recipient discloses the contents to a third party. No-one has access to any private messages unless they are the recipient or the originator.
 
Private Messages are private until the recipient discloses the contents to a third party. No-one has access to any private messages unless they are the recipient or the originator.

And if someone harrasses and abuses someone via PM, the recipient of that message is likely to disclose the contents of the message to a third party, namely the mods/owners.
 
So Private Messages aren't Private?

Let me step in here for a moment as an individual, not speaking for any other owners. However, Private Messages are absolutely private and no one can read the contents on the Private Messages but for the user themselves. The PMs referred to above were sent to all and sundry and then forwarded on to us by people who didn't agree with what was in them.

Also, when banning someone, shouldn't they really be told why they've been banned as opposed to just "persistent trouble making".

Probably right but you'll forgive us for not going out of our way to bend over backwards for people going out of their way to make our lives difficult.

As for the rules of this site, I stated in another topic "Locking threads", that actually the rules aren't clear and that the FAQ which is a useful reference point is pretty much hidden away.

Please tell us where they're not clear and we'll make them clear. As for being hidden away, they could be in a more prominent position, but they've been in the Quick Links drop-down for a good month or so and are very easy to get to.
 
Maybe we should let Cricko open 11 threads about how amazing Ron is. Uxbridge could lock them one after the other, then we could let II back on the board.

Ian and Cricko could kiss and make up, Ian could stop opening a million threads on the same thing (after the first 2/3 had been locked I am sure II is intelligent enough to see where it was going so opening the other 8 or so wsa obviously just to cause problems, and I might take the things he does post a bit more seriously. I feel it is on a par with Wiggy's constant ramblings about Flavs which is why towards the end of II time at SZFC I didn't even bother reading his posts as I put them in much the same stead as graysblue and Wiggy. If you are going to keep opening the same thread over and over again after it has been locked what doyou expect to happen. If you want to know why it has been locked don't try and rally people to your cause by opening yet another thread complaining about it, PM the owners and wait for a reply. If it doesn't come in the first few days tough, this board is for everyone and doesn't pander to your needs and wants. I am sure the owners if they sat down with Ian and talked sensibly then they could sort it out come to an agreement and Ian would be welcomed back to the board. I am surprised that people on here seem to think that Ian got banned because he is anti-ron as that is obviously not the case.

Cricko.Man up. Get a back bone. II says some stuff on a website. SO what. Sticks and stones my friend. It doens't make a different to you, it isn't going to effect you in anyway and if I was in your position I would actually probably laugh at the things he has meant to have been saying.

This seems to have turned into a personal crusade of who can get the most power and II, I am afraid you are going to lose everytime. If you don't want to aplogise then don't but then you wont get back on the board, it is your choice and totally up to you but the threads and moans about him being banned are just as boring as the ones about graysblue and Bluetonic.

Man up everyone and lets actually start talking about important things.
 
OBL I need to point out your mistake, I don't think you meant to green rep me. And if you did you do know I am still an active member in SZFC don't you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ShrimperZone Sponsors

FFM MSPFX Foreign Exchange Services
Estuary MFF2
Zone Advertisers Zone Advertisers

ShrimperZone - SUFC Player Sponsorship

Southend United Away Travel


All At Sea Fanzine


Back
Top