amsemp
Director⭐🦐
As in, we’re still refused access to Wyscout? Or we’ve now paid the bill and can use it again? If we can’t use it then it’s a huge concern.We were refused access to Wyscout because Ron didn't pay the bill lol
As in, we’re still refused access to Wyscout? Or we’ve now paid the bill and can use it again? If we can’t use it then it’s a huge concern.We were refused access to Wyscout because Ron didn't pay the bill lol
Not necessarily the case. xG has become far more prominent in recent years. Player A might have an xG of 20 over 40 games but has scored 5. Player B might have an xG of 5 over 40 games but has scored 20. The data therefore suggests that player A is getting into far more goal scoring positions than player B, who is overperforming to a level that isn’t sustainable (as history shows). There might be a transfer race in the summer for player B, but there’s potentially far more value in player A. If a club can coach player A to convert more chances, you’ve got potentially a very dangerous player on your hands. Movement/runs/intelligence/reading of the game is far more difficult to coach than technique in putting the ball in the onion bag.That's what I thought. The data available might well have painted an adverse picture and halted the process of signing him, in view of his previously uninspiring stats.
Evidence at Roots Hall so far this season may suggest otherwiseNot necessarily the case. xG has become far more prominent in recent years. Player A might have an xG of 20 over 40 games but has scored 5. Player B might have an xG of 5 over 40 games but has scored 20. The data therefore suggests that player A is getting into far more goal scoring positions than player B, who is overperforming to a level that isn’t sustainable (as history shows). There might be a transfer race in the summer for player B, but there’s potentially far more value in player A. If a club can coach player A to convert more chances, you’ve got potentially a very dangerous player on your hands. Movement/runs/intelligence/reading of the game is far more difficult to coach than technique in putting the ball in the onion bag.
I think it's this point that people find hard to reconcile.Please don't go making any comparisons to the analytical approach used by Matthew Benham @ Brentford or Tony Bloom @ Brighton.
Both are basically prodigies when it comes to working with numbers - Benham from his background in finance, and Bloom from his betting/poker.
Critically, both are also minted and well capable of financing Premier League clubs. We, on the other hand, haven't got a pot to **** in. We are by far the largest club in this league, but barely have the buying power of a Wealdstone or Ebbsfleet.
Oldham might disagree with that in terms of pedigree. Also, whilst our crowds are currently bigger, an Oldham side at the top of the league will probably near fill their 13500 capacity ground.We are by far the largest club in this league, but barely have the buying power of a Wealdstone or Ebbsfleet.
which one? I'm tempted to start using football data as a way to improve my R coding abilities (currently on a level with Bonne's goalscoring abilities)Nathan Ralph has the most complete long passes per 90 at 3.4, just ahead of Gubbins at 3.1 and Crowther at 2.8.
Here's a Jack Bridge heatmap for the season if you're interested:
View attachment 35234
And that's just on a free to access, public app.
You've misread their accounts. The numbers you are quoting are losses before player sales.The seasons before they got promoted they were losing 30 and then 50 odd million quid.
Not for me. Finishing is the hardest thing in the game. Having that composure Infront of goal is far harder to coach in my opinion.Movement/runs/intelligence/reading of the game is far more difficult to coach than technique in putting the ball in the onion bag.
When I read that, I did raise an eyebrow.
I’m no technophobe, but I do wonder whether these automated systems can actually be useful in this industry. I don’t know enough about it being used in football to either rubbish or praise it (although I was tempted to insert the Sean Dyche meme until @hlane17 beat me to it )
We do, however, know that the tried and tested method of recruitment based on scouting/hunches/recommendations/reputation can be quite hit and miss. Overall, I think our recruitment under the current regime has been quite good (admittedly this season, probably not so much).
The question is, will these computer analytics find us the next Pepple? Or more concerning, will these analytics see us miss out on the next Pepple because the target hasn’t hit enough of the KPI’s
But if it was old and past its sell by date you’d have eaten itAnalysed the food I made this morning, the data wasn’t quite adding up so didn’t eat it.
The Southend United way