• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

COSU Statement - Friday 7th June

Can someone please post the full statement on here? Thanks.
Following several statements from Southend‐on‐Sea City Council regarding due diligence of the Fossetts Farm housing proposal, COSU wants to provide an update on the implications for Southend United Football Club.

By way of background, before COSU agreed terms to purchase Southend United in October 2023, we sought and received assurances from the Council that they were supportive of our proposal to remain at Roots Hall.
This required an amendment of the prior agreement between the Martins and the Council over Fossetts Farm and Roots Hall.

By removing the new stadium requirement and releasing the associated land for additional property units, it was agreed that funds from development profits could be paid back to the Club for the sole use of refurbishing Roots Hall and the new training ground.
All parties committed to doing their due diligence at speed with an initial target for a November 2023 completion.

As is well documented, the Council‘s estimated due diligence timelines have been consistently revised and consistently missed, but each time we have received assurance across parties that they remained committed to the deal.

Last Friday, it became apparent that the Council did not wish to progress with the property deal along the terms previously agreed with the Martins.

As a result, there has been a round of renegotiation this week with both sides assuring us they intend to find a compromise.

COSU is not directly involved in these negotiations though we continue to stress the urgency of the situation to all.

Even if a compromise is reached, it seems certain that the revised property contract will not be signed prior to the 26th of June winding up hearing for the Club in the High Court.

Signing the amended property contract remains the last condition for the completion of the Club’s sale and COSU cannot see a path forward without it.

For COSU to continue funding the Club and complete the takeover, including reaching payment agreements with the creditors on the winding up petition, we have communicated to the Council and the Martins that we require the following three things:

1. A revised set of terms for the property contract that all parties are committed to closing.

2. An updated scope and realistic timeline for the remaining council due diligence work.

3. An agreement with the Martins to provide security for the further funds COSU will need to inject prior to the takeover.

We see no reason why these criteria cannot be met next week if all parties act reasonably and with focus.

If we reach an agreement, COSU will work with creditors and the league to lift the embargo and release season tickets.

While the situation is outside of our control, COSU wants to assure Southend fans that we are doing as much as possible to prepare for the new season in parallel so that if the deal does complete, we will hit the ground running.

COSU (Custodians of Southend United)
 
“Last Friday, it became apparent that the Council did not wish to progress with the property deal along the terms previously agreed with the Martins.”

I wonder why this is ?
This surely is the key element in the potential collapse of the deal. Also it seems that the pre election situation prevents the council from explaining why there has been a change, possibly because of something that DD has unearthed.
 
To me that statement reads like we still have three parties all looking for different things.

COSU want the football club but don't want to pay more than they have to.

The Council want free housing and don't want to pay for them at all.

The Martins want to make as much money as they can.

Unless two of the parties get together all that will happen is COSU will pull out and they the other two will start talks about putting flats were the ground is or even the new training ground.
 
It seems to me the COSU demands are completely reasonable. This should be taken as 100% the start point.
SCC want to change the deal they took months to negotiate with the Martins. One Cllr Cox said was a great deal and there should be no issues and would be no issues if he was in charge.
We must NOT let a blame game cause us to lose focus- SCC and the Martins are equally responsible, and own this and must fix it. If we make the mistake of concentrating on one party or the other then the pressure on one side will reduce.
BTW SCC may be in purdah but that does not stop protests..
 
as they need to agree a new deal would that mean there needs to be a another dd process
Depends on if the 'new deal' is a tweak of the existing one, so it will probably just need a DD refresh to take account of the tweaks or if the changes are akin to starting again - in which case the DD may need much more work to take account of the changes
 
Excellent and transparent statement putting pressure on both the council and those two ****s to get it sorted or the loss and consequences will lie firmly at their feet.

The only way to play those absolute charlatans ( I can't even bring myself to say that name anymore) is public pressure which senior really doesn't like as it bruises his huge rat ego.
 
It seems to me the COSU demands are completely reasonable. This should be taken as 100% the start point.
SCC want to change the deal they took months to negotiate with the Martins. One Cllr Cox said was a great deal and there should be no issues and would be no issues if he was in charge.
We must NOT let a blame game cause us to lose focus- SCC and the Martins are equally responsible, and own this and must fix it. If we make the mistake of concentrating on one party or the other then the pressure on one side will reduce.
BTW SCC may be in purdah but that does not stop protests..
 
Depends on if the 'new deal' is a tweak of the existing one, so it will probably just need a DD refresh to take account of the tweaks or if the changes are akin to starting again - in which case the DD may need much more work to take account of the changes
I think we are at the between 2 and 3 stage they mentioned- at the point where small amendments to the original deal doesn't resolve the issues, but not at the point where more substantive changes won't resolve and allow it to go forward.

I would guess sufficiently material changes to some of the current agreement that you would characterise it as a new deal. They may agree that quite quickly but even then its back through the DD process...

Quite rightly COSU no longer has faith in the timelines to do this (who on earth would) therefore they want their conditions met- we should regard that being all that matters right at this point.

BTW the election candidates? Is Anna Firth still around? Who is she up against? Her seat is highly marginal, certainly for the outcome of this to make a big difference to either candidate?
 
We must have all Anna Firth contact details

The other likely winner in her seat is

david@davidburtonsampson.co.uk

I assume the ST and supporters groups are all over both to enlist there support- indeed vocal support from both with perhaps even the Echo running with the story will help.

Make it an election issue.
 
A statement for both for the optimists and pessimists.

For the optimists a clear path for how this deal progresses.

For the pessimists this sows the seeds for the consortium withdrawing.
Quite- but should just be ignored- all that maters is supporting the COSU demands and it maters not one jot if you are an optimist or pessimist- that debate can now be parked
 
Back
Top