Stuart W
A word to the wise is enough
I predicted a setback tonight on yesterday's play-off thread, but it was the manner of defeat tonight that I find somewhat worrying.
There are several questions I would like the local press to ask Kev (I know it won't happen).
1) Why does our second-half performance drop like a stone?
2) when we go a goal down it is more or less game over. Tonight the players performance levels plummeted after we went 1-0 down.
3) why do we persist with a formation that rarely works?
I feel sorry for the likes of Wind and even Bridge who both could add a bit of width to the play. Scott-Morriss had so much of the ball down the right flank in the first-half but we barely saw him in the second. Obvious replacement in Wind but Kev can't see it.
It really was a game of two halves tonight but also a game of two styles.
Although you could say Boston's was more basic it was certainly more effective.
FInally, a nice ground for this level apart from the missing 4th side, but I am still hoping that I won't have to return next season even if Boston stay up.
There are several questions I would like the local press to ask Kev (I know it won't happen).
1) Why does our second-half performance drop like a stone?
2) when we go a goal down it is more or less game over. Tonight the players performance levels plummeted after we went 1-0 down.
3) why do we persist with a formation that rarely works?
I feel sorry for the likes of Wind and even Bridge who both could add a bit of width to the play. Scott-Morriss had so much of the ball down the right flank in the first-half but we barely saw him in the second. Obvious replacement in Wind but Kev can't see it.
It really was a game of two halves tonight but also a game of two styles.
Although you could say Boston's was more basic it was certainly more effective.
FInally, a nice ground for this level apart from the missing 4th side, but I am still hoping that I won't have to return next season even if Boston stay up.