• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

Bentley and Coker are the two players we need; no coincidence the upturn of form happened once Ben was back.

That said, put Barret or Prosser alongside Thompson and Smith T or P will be better protected
 
PB already made his decision on Saturday. Would be nice if more on here backed our young keeper, as he has the most difficult position to fill in the whole of L2. If I was a Luton or Wycombe fan i'd be praying that Ted reads this forum.
 
PB already made his decision on Saturday. Would be nice if more on here backed our young keeper, as he has the most difficult position to fill in the whole of L2. If I was a Luton or Wycombe fan i'd be praying that Ted reads this forum.

It's not about backing him or not. For what it's worth I thought he looked very good for a young lad making his debut as a keeper. Problem is, if that defensive performance is relived again this Saturday, we're not doing Ted any favours. I'd stick with him again if Bentley isn't fit, but have a good look at the defensive pairing as they didn't offer him the best protection. I still think he could do with some bulking up as he'll be more confident coming for crosses, but he's got plenty of time to develop further.
 
It's not about backing him or not. For what it's worth I thought he looked very good for a young lad making his debut as a keeper. Problem is, if that defensive performance is relived again this Saturday, we're not doing Ted any favours. I'd stick with him again if Bentley isn't fit, but have a good look at the defensive pairing as they didn't offer him the best protection. I still think he could do with some bulking up as he'll be more confident coming for crosses, but he's got plenty of time to develop further.

I would love to see Barrett and Prosser in front of Ted, I think together they'd offer the experienced and confident presence he needs to shine.
 
Have to ask the question who do Stevenage want to see more in goal for us? Obviously they want to see little ted in before big paul. I would. So we start paul but still take the away win price about Stevenage. 6/1 was rather easy pickings last week.
 
I would stick with Ted, as it's better if Bentley stay at home, rather than risking more injury. What worst, that we lose to Stevenage and Bentley is out for the season.
 
There is no doubt that Ted Smith is going to be a very good goal keeper, but for me he is too lightweight at the moment for league two. Looked vunerable on corners last week due to his slight frame, and Lenny saved his blushes in saving a definate near post goal.
 

ShrimperZone Sponsors

FFM MSPFX Foreign Exchange Services
Estuary MFF2
Zone Advertisers Zone Advertisers

ShrimperZone - SUFC Player Sponsorship

Southend United Away Travel


All At Sea Fanzine


Back
Top