No but I used to work for Swissport
No offence, but you were a baggage handler who stalked peoples luggage before putting up pictures of it and telling us where they were going on holiday. I'm pretty sure Corporate affairs would not be known by Junior staff or it would be plastered over the BBC News within five minutes.
Still have alot of friends who work for Ryanair
Again, no offence, but baggage handlers and air stewardess's will not be involve in the Corporate world.
They have cut their flights down at Stansted
It's common by many of the airlines to reduce their flights in the winter as clearly people are not travelling as much. And also to my knowledge it is because Stansted has substantially raised the taxes for the taking off & landing charges to airlines. I'm not 100% on that point, but as BAA used to be my client in the UK it was certainly their intention to do so just after I left. I left in June 06, so I'd guess the hike was anywhere within 2007 while the market was still booming. Profitable airlines could handle the costs when first proposed, however the credit crisis has just squeezed margins for companies like Ryanair. It has forced them (and all companies) to look at ways to stabilise their revenue, and not see their profits dramatically fall. Reducing a couple of empty flights in expensive airports is common sense.
Or in other words, you need a man and a hose to put out a fire, but the bigger the fire, the more men and hoses you'll need.
So why would they bring some to Southend?
See point above about landing charges. Southend is relatively close to Stansted and would be a hell of a lot cheaper. Commercials decisions are all about the money.
What a stupid question why would they extend their fleet in this current climate?
Wouldn't that be a bit like asking why would they buy a loss making airline? Seen the news lately?
They don't operate any other type of aircraft.
After you've read the news, then feel free to share with us whether they will be operating any other type of aircraft.
The only thing Ryanair want to concour is transatlantic flights.
Assume you mean conquer, which would then be correct. That's their
main priority. Companies like Ryanair did not become as big as they are by only concentrating on one thing at a time though.
The Royal Bank of Scotland's main priority was getting a foothold in the United States banking market. So, it basically went across to the US and invested billions of pounds buying up many smaller banks in order to try and create an empire. When the crisis needed that money, they had nothing to fall back on. See your next point...
Why would Ryanair merge with Easyjet?
Royal Bank of Scotland would quite possibly cease to exist if the UK Government did not save them. Otherwise it is quite likely they would have been forced to sell off their businesses into fragments of what they once were or merged parts of their businesses (subject to competition laws of course).
My point - Big companies merge. Have merged. And are merging. Because they have to.
Did you foresee the banking crisis? Did you foresee Lehman brothers collapsing? Did you foresee two of the UK's biggest banks merging? Did you foresee Iceland's economy having such a profound effect on hundreds of thousands of people in the UK & The Netherlands?
However, if you did see the banking crisis and all of the above then I suggest you are not really a fireman as you must be a very rich man after playing with all your pocket money on the stock market.
My point is, you are a fireman in an airport which has no fires, which means you then sit on a computer surfing the net all day. Unless undercover you are not a Corporate Director discussing mergers & acquisitions of billions or millions of pounds. Some posters on this board get slated (wiggy for example), however at least she is watching the games to have an opinion. You are saying things like fact when you have absolutely no idea what is getting discussed by the Airports Directors, let alone Ryanairs !!