blue sky
First XI
If he is entitled to money under the terms of his contract then the club should pay it to him, draw a line under the Wignall era and move on. The LMA is backing him which suggests that he hmay have a strong case.
All this talk of court action etc will do no-one any good and the club is unlikely to come out of it in a good light. Plus it will cost the club money it cannot afford to wast on expensive lawyers fees etc.
I'm sure Matt The Shrimp will agree with me that the only winners if a case like this goes to court will be the lawyers!
This is not the first example of the club threatening to employ messers Sue Grabbit + Run at the first mention of dispute regarding money owed or criticism. I thought the days of lawsuits flying around had died with Vic Jobson. I hope we will not see a return to legal action at the drop of a hat - its a dangerous precedent and one the club should think about long and hard before persuing this action.
All this talk of court action etc will do no-one any good and the club is unlikely to come out of it in a good light. Plus it will cost the club money it cannot afford to wast on expensive lawyers fees etc.
I'm sure Matt The Shrimp will agree with me that the only winners if a case like this goes to court will be the lawyers!
This is not the first example of the club threatening to employ messers Sue Grabbit + Run at the first mention of dispute regarding money owed or criticism. I thought the days of lawsuits flying around had died with Vic Jobson. I hope we will not see a return to legal action at the drop of a hat - its a dangerous precedent and one the club should think about long and hard before persuing this action.
