".....We should have money to spend because of the stadium being approved but whats the point of strengthing the sqaud if all the players we bring in will never get played?"
I think that you'll find that any money that the new stadium generates wont be available for at least a YEAR - until the first parts of the whole development at Fossetts are complete at the earliest (ie retail units, or the hotel, or the flats...!!) That is because the Ron's people need to SPEND a few million quid building the place before it starts making any money - so the team wont benefit from ANY of it until the whole development starts earning money.
For many reasons (like we're not Championship material yet - we were found out last year, and got relegated!) I believe its a really good thing we are staying in League 1 for another season. Quite simply, the team can survive on less money in wages, and by being sensible with bringing in new players. This is how football should be, and where the true skills of football management are showing. Ron has got it sussed - Tilly and Brush are a superb team, and what they have achieved for us over the past couple of years is nothing short of miraculous!!!
Tilly has been saying for a long time that he's got a real challenge attracting players to Southend, and as a result he shows deserved loyalty to those players who want to work with him, and loses interest in those who dont. That is quite simply because we do not have the money to pay stupidly high wages to any of our players - and some of those that become available, who have been earning silly money, wont necessarily be any better than the players we have already got in the squad. You only have to look at some of the players who have gone to clubs where they earn alot more money - Gutteridge, Constantine, even Freddie. Have they been successful elsewhere - er no!!
Modern football has lost its way in many ways; the money men have far too much influence, and everyone thinks they can buy success. That works for a while - but it will never be enough for these people who invest silly money (why do you think Jose Morhinio got the sack from Chelski - Abramovich wanted success, and as winning the Premiership title and the FA Cup are obvious signs of failure.... it was because Jose he didnt win the Champions League he was shown the door!!!). I personally think that this sort of thing is immoral. It is bad for the fans of these clubs (just look at Leeds - Love or hate them, they got in the position they are in as a direct result of trying to buy success!), its bad for English football at all levels, and it is hurting clubs like ours immensely.
Football is about the fans, the clubs and the players. We showed on Friday that our support is strong, we believe in our club - and our players, regardless of the result - we didnt let our players down; they certainly did not let us down, because we were there in the play offs on merit, and as a DIRECT result of their efforts all season. We had a memorable night - and showed the entire nation what being a true supporter is all about!
I really hate quoting large posts but if quoting it means that it gets more exposure and is more likely to be read then I'm happy to do that with this one as it's not only very balanced but very well structured.
It's a strange situation in football where fans can appreciate that most players are paid too much and most fans pay too much but don't appreciate that most football clubs are such poor business models that they shouldn't even exist. I would say player return on investment and variable costs of matchdays at lower league level are two of the most important things for professional football clubs to be aware of.
Lampard and Makelele probably contributed equally to Chelsea for the three years or so before last season on the pitch on comparable but the amount of revenue they each generate, I imagine would be vastly different. Lampard is an attacking player involved in most goals and his Englishness is something Chelsea and Sky love. Makelele, in contrast is a very arrogant player susceptible to misquoting in the press and is barely involved in action in either penalty box. Lampard deserves to be paid more because he generates more money to the football club even if Makelele has a similar impact on the performance of the team.
The variable matchday costs is something more relevant to Southend as, if you compare debt to revenues, we were probably in as much trouble as high profile cases such as Leeds but got lucky at key times (e.g. appointing Tilson and not Ian Atkins in 04). In contrast, Leeds missed out on their chance (playoffs) and it went horribly wrong putting them in more financial troubles. I remember hearing about our break even figure a couple of years back and it was between 5000 and 5500 bums on seats IIRC. For a club averaging around 3500 fans per match in our midtable League Two position, this was a shocking disparity. It's guesswork for me to estimate what it would be now as the costs of running the club will have changed hugely but I doubt we're running at much above the break even mark at 8173.
It's a laboured argument already but it's worth labouring again and again until the arguments for spending big in the summer stop appearing so regularly. It's clear that Ron Martin isn't rich enough to invest money in to the club without a significant chance of returns and this is undoubtedly the best way for the club to be run. I don't want to be the club whose owner pulls the plug on unlimited funding and suddenly the sky falls down. As a result, we
must only buy players on wages at a level which we can afford based on the current level of revenue less current costs.
From what I have read, we will expect FF to help boost revenue in two ways. Firstly, the cost of running a matchday will fall substantially leaving more of our major revenue source to be spent on the team - a boost in efficiency. Secondly, the retail development around the ground will give us non-matchday revenue which will not only boost revenue in the good times, but help sustain revenue in the bad times - a reduction in risk of the business.
For these reasons, it would be incredibly rash to make any financial gamble in the position we are when we will have more funds available to the club in a season and a half pending final approval and construction. With the limited funds Tilson has had, he has built a team competing with those with huge fanbases funding transfers (Leeds, Forest) and those with more economical stadium set-ups (Swansea, Doncaster). Only Carlisle have been more effective this season and we have finished above both Huddersfield and Millwall who have got more bums on seats.
As I illustrated in a previous post, very few relegated teams get anywhere near promotion and Leeds always looked the likeliest of the three with the money they spent. We've done well to get in the playoffs but Doncaster played a blinder and got all the breaks the other night. It happens sometimes and shouldn't really come as a shock for a team who got beaten heavily away at all bar one of the top 6.
I want this season to be remembered as a step towards longer term success rather than the one before we blew our hard work away on a gamble for instant gratification.