OldBlueLady
Junior Blues Coordinator⭐⭐🦐
Don't for a second think I agree with this article, but I think you've missed the point. It isn't saying kids have to like, or eat spicy food. What it is saying is look for their reaction to the food. If the reaction to (for example) fish and chips is to push it away and refuse to eat it, but their reaction to, say, curry, is to say "Yuk" then the reaction could be considered racist because it is out of the norm for that child.
I still think it's a load of rubbish, but let's at least vilify it for the correct reasons.
No, I think you're reading something in there which isn't there. Young children will go "yuk" to a huge variety of food, and especially if it looks "sloppy" and they can't use their fingers to eat it (so many aren't taught to use cutlery properly). They will also come out with any variety of excuses, whichever they think is going to get them out of it. If the cook happened to be coloured and they had had a falling out with them earlier in the day, they could quite easily answer that the reason they don't like the food is because they don't like the cook. This doesn't mean they have racist tendencies, just that they are too young to be able to formulate and express opinions.
If an Asian child is knocked over during play accidentally, and then goes home and tells their parent that another child (who happens to be white) has knocked them over, does that make the other child racist? Of course it doesn't. Children learn prejudices from other people, watching their reactions to different foods is not going to indicate anything other than the fact that they might have cautious food tastes.