Shrimpers are Magic
President
Thatcher won her no confidence vote and then quit 2 days later. Rees-Mogg would probably see that as a standard being set.
that's my thinking as well - don't remember the numbers in the Thatcher vote though.
Thatcher won her no confidence vote and then quit 2 days later. Rees-Mogg would probably see that as a standard being set.
The difference is he was voted in by the members. The MPs at that point didn't want him, they were shocked that he won and so forced a second leadership election - which he won by more. Since then they managed a nearly universal agreement on a manifesto and then despite all of that recent infighting Labour under Corbyn took 40%. No realistic threats to him now, he will definitely be fighting the next GE as leader.Just googled Jeremy Corbyn (according to Wiki)
Corbyn lost a no vote of confidence by 172 against to 40 in favour in 2016. He seems to be still hanging on in there. So you never know.
55% in her favour apparently.that's my thinking as well - don't remember the numbers in the Thatcher vote though.
she seems to ignore all protocol, the contempt of Parliament followed by cancelling a vote at 24 hours notice after a 2 year build up - if she thinks she can brush those off maybe in her mind this is a mild irritatantCloser than May's then but I thought anything over a hundred against could see her go.
Since Theresa May called a General Election 3 years early despite her party having recently introduced fixed term Parliaments - if you compare manifestos, election campaigns, and then conduct and policy over the 18 months that have followed 'most people' will not be fearing media claims that Labour would be inefficient and shambolic because we are living through the most extreme versions of that with the Tories.
Cameron used that mantra of vote for be to avoid the chaos of Miliband and May used vote for meto avoid the chaos of Corbyn. All we got was the chaos of Cameron and May. That.....project fear....doesn't wash when the thing you warn against is actually happening here and now with the current lot.
The border seemingly trumps everything else for DUP.
It should be remembered that they do what they do and have been happily existing without significant power in the UK Parliament. She went to them not the other way around. When they signed up with her they seemingly gave nothing away. What they need to give away now to keep backing her is too much to ask.
Nigel Dodds said two days ago that they have no fear about what would come with a Labour government and that on current policy Labour are more Unionist than the Tories.
If the DUP are being truthful then they genuinely are prepared to vote down this government.
This evening everyone is discussing sensibly and learning from each other - don't be the one who turns it into a battle eh?Oh dear. You’ve slipped up there and betrayed that you haven’t actually been paying attention but rather ploughing away at your keyboard putting your views forward and shoehorning things to fit.
The DUP don’t give a toss about the border with the Republic. What matters to them is the Union with Great Britain, the maintaining of exactly the same economic and customs arrangements with the UK and, finally, as a Brexit supporting party - Brexit. Their issue with the backstop is that it harms these things. They really could not care less about the border.
This evening everyone is discussing sensibly and learning from each other - don't be the one who turns it into a battle eh?
DUP care very much about the border as their interpretation of the dangers of May's deal is that the border could effectively be in the Irish Sea. That is their big red line. So I have been paying attention after all.
I'm not sure the DUP would be appeased by being told the border in the Irish Sea is just a catchphrase. If Mrs May went in with that angle I'm sure their intention to vote against her deal would become a rock solid resolve.Not really. The ‘border in the Irish Sea’ is a catchphrase to encapsulate the issues I drew attention to - necessary in this time of wall to wall (yet poorer quality) news media. It’s a casual inaccuracy to quote it as the real issue, particularly when there is a real border on the island of Ireland that the DUP’s opponents are using as leverage
I'm not sure the DUP would be appeased by being told the border in the Irish Sea is just a catchphrase. If Mrs May went in with that angle I'm sure their intention to vote against her deal would become a rock solid resolve.
Didn't say that was what I'd do, but what they would probably end up doing! Still think he'll end up leader at some point.Liked that all the way up to Boris
Didn't say that was what I'd do, but what they would probably end up doing! Still think he'll end up leader at some point.
If I could have a free choice of Tories to take charge right now, it would be to invite William Hague back. I just don't see anyone who can sort this mess out.
With a GE they could try to get Johnson in as leader and no deal Brexit as a manifesto promise,
Leaving the EU is of massive importance to these people so unlikely scenarios become possibilities.
that's my thinking as well - don't remember the numbers in the Thatcher vote though.
Let's hope so!There are plenty of Tory voters who see the madness of a No Deal. If they go down that route they'll get hammered.
Au contraire, it's convinced a lot of us that we were more right than ever to push to get out of the EU.Let's hope so!
No deal Brexit has a purity and straightforward feel to it. I wouldn't be surprised if two years of going round in circles has convinced more Leavers that no deal is the way forward.
Au contraire, it's convinced a lot of us that we were more right than ever to push to get out of the EU.
Au contraire, it's convinced a lot of us that we were more right than ever to push to get out of the EU.