• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

The Lee bradbury must start on sat thread

leeblue

Members⭐🦐
Three goals and an assist...........comment on that
I not saying he gonna score 30 goals this season, but he must have jumped ahead of Harrold(god knows anyone marking him does)
 
Dont think there's much doubt about that . Couldn't understand why he was missing against the Oooz - maybe to fire him up ?
 
I know this smacks of hindsight but I honestly thought we missed lee on saturday, yes Harrold deserved a start as no one scored more goals than him in pre season, I only went to one game pre season the Arnheim game and the whole match changed the minute he walked onto the pitch.
 
I know this smacks of hindsight but I honestly thought we missed lee on saturday, yes Harrold deserved a start as no one scored more goals than him in pre season, I only went to one game pre season the Arnheim game and the whole match changed the minute he walked onto the pitch.


fully agree about the Arnhem game . I got a bit slagged for suggesting Bradbury and Harrold before I knew Harry out tonight as they are both similar players but I feel that Harry might well benefit from Bradders' presence and they would both test the opposition defenders in the air , which doesn't happen often with a Southend front two
 
I dont think bradders and harrold should play together both supposed to be similar players, the main difference is that bradders holds the ball up and links up play and harrold doesnt
 
He may not be quick, he may not like shooting (other than tonight), by God is he a good footballer. Fully deserved a hattrick tonight for a fantastic all-round performance.
 
Just heard interview on blues world, he was 'frustrated' to not play on saturday and it was his third hat trick. Says all the lads want is promotion
 
Also we should Start with MacDonald ahead of Hoops. Hoops has promise, but not the footballing brain of Maccy D. If you want to be a bit harsh, not the hunger either. Maccy D seems to want it a lot more than most.

Another player I would like to see start is Black. He seems to add a different dimension to the team, but who do you drop? JCR? No! Gower, probably not, Macca? Yes, but who plays in the middle?
 
Also we should Start with MacDonald ahead of Hoops. Hoops has promise, but not the footballing brain of Maccy D. If you want to be a bit harsh, not the hunger either. Maccy D seems to want it a lot more than most.

Another player I would like to see start is Black. He seems to add a different dimension to the team, but who do you drop? JCR? No! Gower, probably not, Macca? Yes, but who plays in the middle?

I was all for giving Hooper a good run in the side but Charlie Mac showed so much more than Hoops did tonight and really looks like he's desperate for a chance in the first team. I think I'd start with him alongside Bradbury.

As for Black... I just don't see Tilly dropping JCR or Gower yet. Both played well at times tonight. But Black looks another one who appears to have a really good attitude and it won't be long before he gets into the side.
 
May sound a bit crazy but maybe we could have a attacking minded/creative centre midfielder........black in case you wondering
 
Also we should Start with MacDonald ahead of Hoops. Hoops has promise, but not the footballing brain of Maccy D. If you want to be a bit harsh, not the hunger either. Maccy D seems to want it a lot more than most.

Another player I would like to see start is Black. He seems to add a different dimension to the team, but who do you drop? JCR? No! Gower, probably not, Macca? Yes, but who plays in the middle?


Sorry Fella , but if JCR fails to deliver then he is the most likely IMO , barring injuries etc
 
I don't think it's any secret i'm not his biggest fan, but I whole heartedly agree that he should start ahead of Harrold at the weekend. I do think though that Charlie Mac should play ahead of Hooper though...
 
I was all for giving Hooper a good run in the side but Chalrie Mac showed so much more than Hoops did tonight and really looks like he's desperate for a chance in the first team. I think I'd start with him alongside Bradbury.

As for Black... I just don't see Tilly dropping JCR or Gower yet. Both played well at times tonight. But Black looks another one who appears to have a really good attitude and it won't be long before he gets into the side.


On the other hand I feel that Hooper and Bradbury play well together and Hooper got a couple at Elland road last year in the carling , so I'd bring CMac on if we need to freshen things up
 

ShrimperZone Sponsors

FFM MSPFX Foreign Exchange Services
Estuary MFF2
Zone Advertisers Zone Advertisers

ShrimperZone - SUFC Player Sponsorship

Southend United Away Travel


All At Sea Fanzine


Back
Top