[b said:
Quote[/b] (Matt the Shrimp @ July 22 2005,16:51)]Looks like I'll be there to watch the Aussies go one-up on Sunday...
I was there yesterday... and it was miserable. It goes down as one of the worst days of international cricket at which I've had the misfortune to be present. The worst thing is that, so far as I know, I will not be entitled to a refund - even though I witnessed fewer than ten overs' play yesterday.
It p*ssed it down for the 6 hours from when I arrived (9.45 a.m. or so) until play started (3.45pm).
I was then "treated" to an hour of monstrously awful cricket from everyone in an England shirt bar Pietersen. G.O. Jones's shot was diabolical. In what conceivable way - when, potentially, there was plenty of rain about and thus playing conservatively must have been the only course to be taken - did he think his casual on-side slap was in any way appropriate? Nob.
Giles was little better... his second ball a textbook piece of fishing outside off-stump, and the ball was duly chipped to gully.
At this point, Pietersen realised he was running out of partners, and so he began to open up. In a memorable over against Warne, he brought up his fifty by running two after a measured on-side drive. The next ball, he absolutely thumped Warne out of the ground with a huge on-side six, and then almost repeated the feat the following ball with another straight drive which only just bounced inside the boundary rope for four. You could tell that Shane was a tad miffed by the fact that KP had larruped him so dismissvely for 12 in an over.
Meanwhile, McGrath continued to clean up at the other end... and sure enough, KP ran out of partners. Less than an hour after they'd started - including a break for 10 minutes after a sharp shower - the Aussies had won a crushing victory. Needless to say, I was more than a tad miffed.
So, where does this leave England? Right now is not the right time to be advocating wholesale changes, but the following thoughts come to mind:
*The only player to come out totally unblemished is Harmison. Two cracking bowling performances, and match returns of 8/107 (including a five-fer) is highly respectable given the opposition. He created genuine fear and respect amongst the Aussies.
*From a batting point of view, Kevin Pietersen was quite clearly the right pick for the side... and (as Mike Atherton said on C4 yesterday) the selectors c*cked it up at the beginning of the summer. The question ought never to have been Pietersen or Thorpe; it ought instead to have been Thorpe or Bell back in May. They picked Bell - and perhaps they picked wrong. Bell has gone from smearing the equivalent of a minor counties attack (Bangladesh) to facing Warne & McGrath - and he is clearly not ready, which is a huge shame. The only question is: what will damage Bell more - being dropped now, or being taken apart by Warne, Lee and McGrath for the rest of the series? My guess is that another pair of single figure scores at Egbaston will lead to a campaign of begging outside Graham Thorpe's house for one last hurrah against the Aussies.
*Vaughan needs to sort himself out quick. Mike Brearley he clearly ain't. The Ayatollah may have been a mediocre batsman himself, but as a psychology graduate, he knew how to wring 100% out of the likes of Beefy, Bob Willis, John Emburey and Graham Dilley. Vaughan has not done that this Test. Look at Freddy - some key wickets, perhaps (notably Gilchrist, twice) - but bloody expensive... match stats of 4/173 simply isn't good enough; and he failed miserably twice with the bat. This is, by a country mile, the toughest hour of Vaughan's captaincy. He needs to respond in the simplest - and yet most difficult - way possible: runs. He neads a hatful at Egbaston.
*I think our openers will do OK. Both sets of openers had a poor first innings - but at 80/0 in the second innings, we looked fine. It was the failure of Vaughan, Bell and Freddy with the bat that screwed us, not Banger & Strauss.
*Bowl Jones more. If it were not for dropped catches, his figures would have been far better. Inded, the bowling attack looked generally OK, apart from the King of Spain (who was woeful) and the fact that Freddy was far too loose, too often.
*Catching... obviously our biggest flaw. Catches win matches, as they say. KP was the highest-profile casualty - but he can improve - or be stuck out in the deep. But the biggest worry was G.O. Jones. Two or three regulation chances were put down - and that simply won't do. Time for Fozzie and Chris Read to start grafting, and getting some high profile scores together in the County Championship. If Jones continues to fail with the gloves as badly as he did at Lord's, then his spot in the side is in my view definitely up for grabs. His second-innings batting did little to reinforce his candidature for selection, yesterday.
The selectors are unlikely to change anything in advance of Egbaston, I'd wager. But they will hopefully be making notes of whom they need to watch. If the Aussies go 2-0 up in Birmingham (which they will if we play as poorly there as we did at Lord's), then the selectors will need to make changes if we're to save the series - and, importantly, save the cricketing summer.
After all, the Old Trafford Test coincides with the kick-off of the Premier$hite season. If we go 3-0 down there, then cricket will be relegated to the inside pages for the rest of the summer - and if that happens, it must be seen as a massive failure on the part of the ECB. I hope it doesn't happen.
Here's to a big improvement in England's fortunes in the next 10 days.
Matt