@Ricey your comments are fair enough and i did think about whether to invite Frank (his miss v Charlton still haunts), but having seen some of his family orientated and positive online posts and then when asked to join his compliments about SUEPA I was won over. That said, and not liking to see any player publicly castigated online (it's not what SUEPA is about) i decided not to announce his joining on SUEPA social channels as i thought there could be a risk of that which he might see.
Anyhows, it does bring me to a point id quite like views on from you and others on SZ, namely should SUEPA exclude inviting certain folk to join or should we be fully invlusive?
There will always be players that some will think less of than others, it's a game of opinions. And some players who are generally loved for their time with us will have fallen foul of the law, we can all name a SUFC Convicts XI, and some of those are SUEPA members (and a few have been our match day guests and received standing ovations).
Generally perhaps the ex players (or coaching staff) who we might think of as a bit toxic would probably not want to be involved anyway. I have not for instance sought to seek out the likes of David Roche, Sol Campbell, Kevin Bond, Nial Ranger (tho in his early days with us he was great), Liam Ridgewell or Mark Moseley, but perhaps i should?
Time can be a great healer, and had SUEPA existed in 1994 I would perhaps have not invited Barry Fry, but a nicer more generous man you could not wish to meet, and without asking he is always the first to support any charity etc appeal (which he has done for us every time) and his Message to Ron video was just brilliant.
To me, maintaining the credibility of SUEPA is vital. It is all about inclusive care, but maybe there are lines that need to be drawn. I never want to cause upset or rock the boat with it. And i know it's impossible to please everyone so keeping everyone happy is an unobtainable goal.
Tucked away in this corner of the Zone is perhaps the ideal place for this to be debated as I suspect very few if any of the players likely to be subject to 'should we or shouldn't we' debate come here to browse.
So, without perhaps debating specific players, views please from all on the general principle of whether everyone eligible should be invited or whether there is a line to be drawn in certain cases.
Thanks