mattitouk
Life President
Not sure if this has been mentioned prior, but I have just noticed that Saturdays game against Walsall was Phil's 161st game in charge of Southend, which was the same amount of games Paul Sturrock was in charge for also. (according to Wikipedia).
The stats over both their reigns are almost exactly the same, (breakdown below) so who do you think was / is the better manager over their 161 games each? of course we could say Phil because he has managed us at a higher level or some could say Paul was considering what he achieved on a shoe string budget when he took over.
Paul Sturrock
Games = 161
Won = 67
Drawn = 43
Lost = 51
Win Ratio % = 41.6
Phil Brown
Games = 161
Won = 66
Drawn = 45
Lost = 50
Win Ratio % = 41.0
I believe Wikipedia includes all games including cup games, however just purely based on each match managed and that each win was 3 points and a draw 1 point etc, Paul Sturrock achieved 244 points during his time with us, whilst Phil was just a single point behind with 243 points after the equal 161 games in charge.
The stats over both their reigns are almost exactly the same, (breakdown below) so who do you think was / is the better manager over their 161 games each? of course we could say Phil because he has managed us at a higher level or some could say Paul was considering what he achieved on a shoe string budget when he took over.
Paul Sturrock
Games = 161
Won = 67
Drawn = 43
Lost = 51
Win Ratio % = 41.6
Phil Brown
Games = 161
Won = 66
Drawn = 45
Lost = 50
Win Ratio % = 41.0
I believe Wikipedia includes all games including cup games, however just purely based on each match managed and that each win was 3 points and a draw 1 point etc, Paul Sturrock achieved 244 points during his time with us, whilst Phil was just a single point behind with 243 points after the equal 161 games in charge.