I think you have been a victim of autocorrect.
I said ‘zoomed out’ which would mean you take a look at the bigger picture over a longer period of time.
I think you meant to type ‘zoned out’ which would mean you’ve given up hope and are fixated on whatever negative is most current.
Hence my comment that the project still isn’t achieving it’s objectives. We are still in extremely grave danger of relegation and the dire mistakes that continue to be made by the project leader continue to be rectified too slowly
The short term objective is staying up. Yes that’s right....that in football terms is the short term. The longer term objective is improvement....in the entire set up and running of the business and football performances.
However, of course, in order to meet the short term objective of staying up we need to make some improvements quickly. However take the season as a whole that has been achieved already...take Xmas until February (considerably short term) and again it’s been achieved.
I agree there is a real danger of still being relegated, but this is largely down to the speed in which the current manager was allowed to make the improvements needed...ie lifting the embargo and being given the opportunity to move players out before moving others in. He’s done that under considerable restraints I’m sure you’ll agree? One of those restraints and a highly credible one is the fact there are limited opportunities (transfer windows) and considerable lack of ability (funds, owner, attractiveness of the football club in general) to bring the required players into the club. For example if anyone on here clamouring for a proven goalscorer thinks that MM doesn’t know that himself, they are deluded. But bringing them in is a different matter altogether! It’s surely a problem that he’s recognised and surely even for the most ignorant among us, it even partially explains the decision tactically to focus on not conceding goals giving us the best possible chance of picking up points either by drawing 0-0 or requiring minimal goals to actually win a game. Surely given the general acceptance of our dire goalscoring ability no one wants us to be in situations where we need 3 or even 4 goals to achieve what we currently need 0 or 1 to achieve?
So is he really learning too slowly or has he done all he can within the windows and is now left making the best of what he has at his disposal with the best tactical plan he can use given the dearth of abilities in the area everyone knows (inc the manager) is the problem? Who would you play up front? How many risks of conceding more goals than you felt you were capable of scoring would you take?
Improvement is not an objective but an absolutely necessary part of the process required to achieve the objective, which can only be achieved if we win more points than any two other teams in the worst division in the Football League. To do this we must score goals and the project continues to make scoring goals more difficult not easier.
Surely improvement is an objective? How can it not be? Not an improvement in style but an improvement in performance and results surely an objective of all managers in this situation. As you say, it’s absolutely necessary. However, again, look at the upward curve in points gained. We are now outperforming and picking up more points than several other teams in the division. This makes our current predicament a historical problem not so much a current one....which means there has been progress.
We are however, gaining more points than other teams despite not scoring goals. Thus making the job easier not harder. Scoring 2/3 goals a game and losing would be much harder than picking up 0-0s surely that’s obvious? The fact that the team continue to create enough chances to win games whilst still not conceding is surely proof that the manager is actually getting things right tactically with only individual performance maybe being the teams downfall?
The necessary Improvement on Sol's work needed to achieve the objective should not have been difficult but boy does it take time for the penny to drop with MM.
Should not have been difficult? Are you serious? Sol worked under considerable restraints but MM initially had to then work under the same, with the additional loss of some key players in Humphry’s, Kelman, both of whom had scored goals for Sol. That in itself (rate them or not) was a severe handicap in the strikers department. Add to that the global pandemic and the curtailment of a season that saw players not kick a football from March to July. Who then returned late to training due to a **** poor approach by the owner who fannied around making an appointment, with limited friendlies against thrown together opposition from local (very low level) non league. Lack of fitness and preparation was always (as was predicted by several more knowledgable posters) going to result in being off the pace through August, September and October. This is surely where the damage was done.
o use the common sense approach
In order to stay up we probably need at least 47 points - another 18 points at least.
Six wins from 13 games or 5 wins and 3 draws or 4 wins, 6 draws and only 3 defeats.
Not true. There is no telling what points total is needed to stay up. You said it yourself, we need to have more points than two other teams. Like it or not, their performances are as important as our own. Current form is a better indication of what we’ll need to stay up, rather than an arbitrary points total based on previous seasons, none of which bare any resemblance to this unique one.
What we need is to gain maximum of 4 less points from 13 games than Grimsby can from 15 games and 1 more point from 13 games than Barrow can from 15 games. Or of course, we could continue to pick up the same ratio of points as we have for the last 15 games as Colchester and / or Port Vale continue to do the same.....we could end up finishing outside the bottom 4! Keep an eye on Mansfield too btw as despite their previous run of unbeaten form they have recently returned to the sort of form that saw them sack their manager while in the bottom 3.
Do you think that the project is on course?
Absolutely. I defy anyone to prove statistically or otherwise that the improvements aren’t obvious and the upward curve in points based form isn’t better than other sides around us. That in itself demonstrates a path that is ‘on course’ to achieve its objective.
Chin up me old mucker. Glass half full and be positive. It’s a much happier place to be ?