• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

Post-Match Thread and Ratings Southend United 0-0 Braintree Town

Listened to this one on the radio but sounded like a carbon copy of the game last week - good spell after half time but other than that, lots of huffing and puffing.

Shopping list needs to include a couple of strikers, an experienced centre half but also some quality out side as the delivery into the box is 9/10 poor.

I think Maher has earned the chance to have a go next season with a normal pre season but would think that if he has a poor first 10 games, he would be in trouble.

Really important pre season for recruitment coming up (in and out) so we shall see if our scouting team have got some ideas lined up.
 
Yeah, but how many have they conceded? Clean sheets will get us out of the league, not loads of goals.

That's sarcasm by the way 🙂
It’s quite a fair point. Clean sheets are important and above us there is one club (Gateshead) that has conceded more (and by a fair distance) but it’s not the number of goals conceded that has done for us.
 
I eish people would get over this embargo shackled team ,Naher had part off the preseason and a full January transfer window to get the business done and what does he come up with, Strikers BONNE ,WALKER , Waldron, Kendall, and Hopper for gods sake ,a past player whose goal scoring record is ****e, Theres 5 strikers that i dont think have scored 10 goals between them ,Wake up call needed, they were Mahers choices they werent forced on him,He has to go along with that so called strike force and somany others, Maher even said in his chat this week what a good GK he thinks Hayes is ,says it all to me. Time to bite the bullet COSU or there will be a big down turn in ST sales and attendances im sorry to say ,Need some positivity from you. I love you COSU and thankful for saving my club , but now you need to start making some hard decisions regarding the management and players .
To an extent signings were forced on him.
Elsewhere, I said we were left with the leftovers. I'm not defending the players named. Like you, I don't rate them as Championship winning material.
Hayes as back-up or even first-team if Collin falters, who by no means is the finished article, is more than OK for the NL.
Hayes doesn't command a box or kick that well, nor does Collin, but he's an excellent shot stopper.
I'm not sure what you mean by 'positivity'? But, I might remind there is a budget.
Do we want to sign lesser players on money we can afford, or do we want to go to the wall for a block of flats?
Ron would have chosen the latter.
 
Last edited:
To an extent signings were forced on him.
Elsewhere, I said we were left with the leftovers. I'm not defending the players named. Like you, I don't rate them as Championship winning material.
Hayes as back-up or even first-team if Collin falters, who by no means is the finished article, is more than OK for the NL.
Hayes doesn't command a box or kick that well, nor does Collin, but he's an excellent shot stopper.
I'm not sure what you mean by 'positivity'? But, I might remind there is a budget.
Do we want to sign lesser players on money we can afford, or do we want to go to the wall for a block of flats?
Ron would have chosen the latter.
if the budget was low, and we'd missed out on all our first choice signings then surely we should have just kept the core and really played the loan market instead of signing players that deep down they dont want....

Forwards are hit n miss as we know and can be crap at one club and flourish at another, but im pretty sure not many other teams would constantly persist with strikers with such incredibly low scoring stats.

If a loanee gets recalled then find another.....
 
If anyone missed the detail of the game here is a VERY full description from the Braintree fans forum:

"It was a hard earned point for the Iron at a raucous Roots Hall this afternoon, with a strong rear-guard action forming the foundation which the home side struggled to breach.

With loan players being recalled, there was only four subs available to Steve Pitt, Alan Judge coming into make his first start for the club. The Iron kicked off and having played back to Langston, he launched it forward, Akinde wins the ball and lays the ball off, Judge tries to break away and is taken out with a crude slide tackle earning a very early yellow card for Ralph. Judge takes the free kick out on the left and goes for goal Hayes dives and gets it out via the post for a corner, nothing comes from it.

Parillon gets away down the Iron right, he feeds Bonne inside him and he hits an early shot bringing Grey into action with a good diving save. A lot of the football is scrappy with over/under hit passes and tackles flying in.

Blackwell attacks down the right and goes to the by-line winning a corner; Akinde meets it at the back stick and it's cleared off the line. Parillon raids again latching onto a long ball down the line, cuts inside as the angle narrows and Grey saves at his near post.

As the game flows from end to end, Braintree come again Blackwell cutting inside but his shot lacks power. From another Blackwell corner Langston glances his header across goal, Akinde retrieves it but is given offside. Southend's main threat continues to be Parillon and another good run from him sees him deliver a teasing cross which evades anyone in blue with Clampin seeing it out.

Annesley gets a facial injury and has to leave the field and a change of shirt. Another Iron attack and Lisbie has it just outside the left edge of the area, he manages to shrug off his marker but his shot is half blocked, it comes to Blackwell who fluffs his chance from 8 yards unable to sort his feet out. After the breakdown of a Southend attack, Grey retrieved the ball and does keepy-uppies which earns him a yellow card. The final attack sees Grey again called to save at his near post, five minutes are added as a fairly even first half ends.

Southend go on the attack from the re-start, getting the ball forward quickly using both flanks. Grey has to react well to a half-volley on the edge of the box from top scorer Scott-Morris, tipping it over the bar. From the corner the ball is partially cleared and Grey is there to turn away a deflected effort.

The Iron's first attack of the half is a lightning break, Lisbie and Blackwell are away, Lisbie gets into the box and has a shot which is saved and breaks loose it domes to Blackwell who somehow lets the keeper smother his effort. Southend keep coming and a dangerous right wing cross just evades Boone and it's cleared for a corner before the next blue shirt can reach it.

On 73 minutes Annesley finally has to come off and Pinnington comes on with Clarke-Francis shuffling across to centre back. The Shrimpers best chance sees Scott-Morris with another attempt from just outside the box but he blazes it over the bar. Cooper comes on for Judge on 80 minutes. Braintree make another promising break, a pass forward sees Akinde in a race with a defender, he looks to be winning the race but pulls up clutching his hamstring which sees him replaced by Fyfield.

As Southend pour forward there's another incisive counter from Braintree, the ball comes out to the edge of the box to Cooper but he fires over. With plenty of stoppages and subs 8 minutes of added time is shown, in the first of those Grey does well getting down to save a low shot from Kendall. The Iron manage to see it out under pressure and grab a massive point they earned."
Great report and the sort of thing I used to do years ago on "The fbm view and ratings" thread. Anyone remember them? I was the official SZ match reporter for a few seasons! Time commitments have stopped me doing them like that for years, but they generated thought and discussion about the match itself and not just a stream of abusive posts about how crap the manager is. These days, the post match thread is becoming more toxic and divisive than the old threads trying to get Ron out!

Is there any report or ratings on this thread? I gave up after page 1 of the same old stuff that's posted after every match where we don't win these days.

For me, I think I watched a different match to everyone else.

It was just as frustrating as the previous 2 games, but otherwise a much better match than last week. There was terrific effort, we hit the post, their keeper made a couple of great saves, two and possibly three strong penalty shouts and there were two low undefendable crosses put in that strikers were centimetres away from. If any one of those goes our way, we have a completely different performance and subsequent narrative. (Note - this is what football is all about. This is why one minute a player will do something that wouldn't be out if place if done by Messi and another will leave you wondering how he is even a professional footballer.)

As for Braintree, their game seem to be very much counter attacking, otherwise lump it up to Akinde and see what happens. Lisbie looked lively but moaned a lot and should have been sent off for simulation in injury time. However, they had their chances as well. They hit the post in the first minute from a free kick, could have scored in each half with two efforts that should have made Hayes work but instead were over the bar, and there was an almighty, old fashioned, goalmouth scramble where somehow Hayes smothered the ball.

So forgive me, but comments from some that that was the worst match they've ever seen are made by people with clearly very short memories. Maidenhead at home? The cup game v Sittingbourne? Please, have a day off. As a game, I've seen far worse. It was however incredibly frustrating, granted.

We were absolutely dominant with possession but many teams come here and use the low block which is unbelievably difficult to play against at any level. We did it (or the equivalent of it) against Chelsea at Stamford Bridge in the FA Cup years ago. Their team of top internationals couldn't get through us.

The play off dream isn't over - well, not quite - but there's part of me that just wants this to end now so that the three amigos have a full pre-season to get their targets in, get everyone fully fit and then ram every dissenters words down their throats by getting us into L2, or, as is probably more likely, getting to to a point where COSU will make a change so that at last we can stop hearing the same broken record. We're 8th and still in with a shout of the play offs for God's sake, bloody hell, in December we were just as likely to go down! You'd think we'd just been relegated reading some of this stuff, you really would. People, COSU aren't going to get rid of Maher at this point. Get over it.

RATINGS - just for a change.

Hayes - 7 - Good early save from the free kick, quick distribution.

GSM - 6 - Nearly scored with a great effort but he really isn't a good defender. Thank God for his goals and he's probably nailed on POTY, but I think he unbalances us. If someone offered money for him, I'd take it.
Ralph - 8 - Solid, so good in the air. However, his contract is up at the end of the season and I'm wondering if he's been here a bit too long.
Goodliffe - 7 - Harshly got booked after 30 seconds in my opinion but didn't do a lot wrong after that.
Taylor - 8.5 - MOM - Barely put a foot wrong for once (he's usually got some costly mistake in his game) with my only criticism being he sometimes isn't brave enough with the ball and goes for the safe option rather than an attacking option (like many of the players and that's a confidence issue, not the way Maher is telling them to play. Just saying.)
Morton - 6 - Didn't do much, should have done much more.
Husin - 6 - I'm not sure Morton is the best partner for him. An undoubtably good player, but needs a different style of player alongside him to bring the best out of his game. In training, he is awesome but it doesn't always transfer to the matchday.
Coker -5 - Disappointing delivery, passing, shooting and very lucky to stay on the pitch after an awful tackle. Another who looks far better in training than during the game itself.
Bonne - 7 - Incredibly hard working, just doesn't score enough.
Walker - 6 - Did some good bits but was largely anonymous
Parillon - 8 - Our most attacking option. Still raw, still lots to learn, but looked like the only one who was going to make anything happen today.

The ref - 8 - I though he was pretty good. Certainly consistent and let pretty much everything go. He got some decisions wrong of course, but everyone does that.
 
Why do people love Kev, mystery to me?
Was an accomplished crab type midfielder and as a manager has had so many chances to kick on but always falls flat at the final hurdle. Done well when the chips were down and does ok against the better teams. Disastrous against very poor teams for some reason.
Terrible , irritable radio interviews and turns against his own crowd .
Picks totally out of form players that no one that watches them regularly would do and drops in form , positive ones.
Total failure of a season that should easily be top 5 , three coaches that will continue to bore and waste everybody’s time and money….why the love in, anybody else with Maher’s achievements would have been long gone, is he genuinely any better than Moisley, Bond, Powell, Brown….easy answer to that but no, let’s give him more time to confirm that he just ain’t got it?
It's not about loving Kev (I don't in particular), it's about giving him a fair crack of the whip without having his hands tied behind his back.

Next season will be the first time that will happen. It'll almost be his first season.

If you get rid now, you have to pay off his contract. What about Currie and Bentley? Do they go with him or take charge? What do they and the players think? They all seem like a solid team to me. So, if you get rid of all 3 (which if you're going to do one, do them all) there's three contracts that have to be paid off.

Then, who are you going to bring in? How long will they get to get their team in? At least 3 seasons I would suggest.

Then, if it doesn't work (there's a 50/50 shot of that), do you do it again? Pay off more contracts?

This is what used to happen and what COSU are trying to get away from.

So have some patience and if it's that bad, don't come to watch.
 
Great report and the sort of thing I used to do years ago on "The fbm view and ratings" thread. Anyone remember them? I was the official SZ match reporter for a few seasons! Time commitments have stopped me doing them like that for years, but they generated thought and discussion about the match itself and not just a stream of abusive posts about how crap the manager is. These days, the post match thread is becoming more toxic and divisive than the old threads trying to get Ron out!

Is there any report or ratings on this thread? I gave up after page 1 of the same old stuff that's posted after every match where we don't win these days.

For me, I think I watched a different match to everyone else.

It was just as frustrating as the previous 2 games, but otherwise a much better match than last week. There was terrific effort, we hit the post, their keeper made a couple of great saves, two and possibly three strong penalty shouts and there were two low undefendable crosses put in that strikers were centimetres away from. If any one of those goes our way, we have a completely different performance and subsequent narrative. (Note - this is what football is all about. This is why one minute a player will do something that wouldn't be out if place if done by Messi and another will leave you wondering how he is even a professional footballer.)

As for Braintree, their game seem to be very much counter attacking, otherwise lump it up to Akinde and see what happens. Lisbie looked lively but moaned a lot and should have been sent off for simulation in injury time. However, they had their chances as well. They hit the post in the first minute from a free kick, could have scored in each half with two efforts that should have made Hayes work but instead were over the bar, and there was an almighty, old fashioned, goalmouth scramble where somehow Hayes smothered the ball.

So forgive me, but comments from some that that was the worst match they've ever seen are made by people with clearly very short memories. Maidenhead at home? The cup game v Sittingbourne? Please, have a day off. As a game, I've seen far worse. It was however incredibly frustrating, granted.

We were absolutely dominant with possession but many teams come here and use the low block which is unbelievably difficult to play against at any level. We did it (or the equivalent of it) against Chelsea at Stamford Bridge in the FA Cup years ago. Their team of top internationals couldn't get through us.

The play off dream isn't over - well, not quite - but there's part of me that just wants this to end now so that the three amigos have a full pre-season to get their targets in, get everyone fully fit and then ram every dissenters words down their throats by getting us into L2, or, as is probably more likely, getting to to a point where COSU will make a change so that at last we can stop hearing the same broken record. We're 8th and still in with a shout of the play offs for God's sake, bloody hell, in December we were just as likely to go down! You'd think we'd just been relegated reading some of this stuff, you really would. People, COSU aren't going to get rid of Maher at this point. Get over it.

RATINGS - just for a change.

Hayes - 7 - Good early save from the free kick, quick distribution.

GSM - 6 - Nearly scored with a great effort but he really isn't a good defender. Thank God for his goals and he's probably nailed on POTY, but I think he unbalances us. If someone offered money for him, I'd take it.
Ralph - 8 - Solid, so good in the air. However, his contract is up at the end of the season and I'm wondering if he's been here a bit too long.
Goodliffe - 7 - Harshly got booked after 30 seconds in my opinion but didn't do a lot wrong after that.
Taylor - 8.5 - MOM - Barely put a foot wrong for once (he's usually got some costly mistake in his game) with my only criticism being he sometimes isn't brave enough with the ball and goes for the safe option rather than an attacking option (like many of the players and that's a confidence issue, not the way Maher is telling them to play. Just saying.)
Morton - 6 - Didn't do much, should have done much more.
Husin - 6 - I'm not sure Morton is the best partner for him. An undoubtably good player, but needs a different style of player alongside him to bring the best out of his game. In training, he is awesome but it doesn't always transfer to the matchday.
Coker -5 - Disappointing delivery, passing, shooting and very lucky to stay on the pitch after an awful tackle. Another who looks far better in training than during the game itself.
Bonne - 7 - Incredibly hard working, just doesn't score enough.
Walker - 6 - Did some good bits but was largely anonymous
Parillon - 8 - Our most attacking option. Still raw, still lots to learn, but looked like the only one who was going to make anything happen today.

The ref - 8 - I though he was pretty good. Certainly consistent and let pretty much everything go. He got some decisions wrong of course, but everyone does that.
Thats a throwback to the old days, an actual match report...

Makes you wonder if we are all so burned by ron and years of failure if we will ever go back to normal, or if a new appointment will have a "manager out" thread after 5 games....

Be a nightmare for mods, but maybe post match threads should only about the match...
 
Great post FBM, although I disagree with some of the ratings.

Hayes 6 - did what he had to

Gus 7 - solid enough defensively and a few good efforts at goal
Goodliffe 5 - silly early tackle / follow through, and then too many mistakes. I had him at fault for the goalmouth scramble and the “dive” at the end he just missed the ball
Taylor 6 - some great tackling, but one time it was because he missed a simple header and he had to. Distribution was too safe

Morton - 5. I’m struggling to think of any pass today that was in anyway incisive or with any adventure
Husin - 7. Played quite a few nice balls out wide to set up play and push us forward. Gets his fair share of critics, but I think he’s our best central midfielder
Coker - 6. I thought he started brightly for the first 20 minutes and then drifted out of the game.

Parillon - 7. Made some great runs and created our best chance. Lost the ball a few times, but these were in the right spot when trying to create. Set KAF off twice with some excellent play.
Walker - 7. Seemed able to beat a man today. Tricky and held the ball up well. Created one goal of the season opportunity for himself, but then shot to the keepers near post when going across goal had runners of a miscue of a spill from the keeper.
Bonne - 4. I don’t get it. One time he ran 30 yards backwards, received a 10 yard pass from Goodliffe and first time passed it 10 yards straight back to him. I missed the games where he allegedly played well, so I have no idea how he gets a game. Oh. And he missed our best chance where he received a lay off 10 yards out and hit it within range of their (excellent) keeper

Subs
KAF - 5. Nothing came of the two times he was given the ball to break. Pleasing player on the eye and certainly not our worst, but attacking mids need to make sure an effort on goal comes from that kind of opportunity

Kendall - 6. His movement showed Bonne up for me. For the first time the midfielders had an option of a forward making a run. This enabled him to get a few efforts on goal.

Miley - 5. Not sure he was the right player to come on, but Morton wasn’t the right player to keep on

Hopper - 4. Just doesn’t look like there is anything left in the locker on the attacking front. Good for set pieces at both ends.

Bridge - 6. Got a lot of the ball. Inconsistent as ever, but fizzed one great ball across which a better centre forward than any of ours would have been tapping in.

Ref - 7. I liked him. He didn’t get every decision right, but he was in control of the game.

New segregation system in the car park - 0. When they first did this I couldn’t understand how segregating though the car park and throwing everyone out together on vic avenue with no security there would work. It annoyed me as I have to walk around the whole thing to get in. Anyway - first time we have a proper sized away following and there was trouble at the exit. I hope the security consultancy who recommended that haven’t cashed the cheque yet.
 
Last edited:
Thats a throwback to the old days, an actual match report...

Makes you wonder if we are all so burned by ron and years of failure if we will ever go back to normal, or if a new appointment will have a "manager out" thread after 5 games....

Be a nightmare for mods, but maybe post match threads should only about the match...
I don’t think it’s about Ron that one. I think it’s more a social media change over the last 20 or so years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fbm
It's not about loving Kev (I don't in particular), it's about giving him a fair crack of the whip without having his hands tied behind his back.

Next season will be the first time that will happen. It'll almost be his first season.

If you get rid now, you have to pay off his contract. What about Currie and Bentley? Do they go with him or take charge? What do they and the players think? They all seem like a solid team to me. So, if you get rid of all 3 (which if you're going to do one, do them all) there's three contracts that have to be paid off.

Then, who are you going to bring in? How long will they get to get their team in? At least 3 seasons I would suggest.

Then, if it doesn't work (there's a 50/50 shot of that), do you do it again? Pay off more contracts?

This is what used to happen and what COSU are trying to get away from.

So have some patience and if it's that bad, don't come to watch.
After four seasons of Maherball i think it is reasonable to conclude that he has had enough opportunity to show his worth. One can list all kinds of excuses and justifications for his failure to restore the club to the Football League, but the fact remains we now face another year in the NL. As a player, he had a specific, limited role which worked because of other more creative spirits in the squad. As a manager, his style is exactly the same, keep possession, at all costs, and the other side can't score if we do that. Flair players do not fit in to this philosophy, nor do those not averse to shooting from a distance nor those who try to thread a pass through the middle. His penchant for playing favourites like Bridge, Miley and Husin has become s sick joke, the dropping of our player of the month yesterday was typical. Substitutions, the choice of and timings another weakness. Signing of strikers with a proven record of not being goalscorers. Failure to respond to events during a game where tactical tweaking is needed Conduct as the manager far from becoming.. I could go on. Surely COSU have seen enough to know what they should do even if it costs. For the long term and to ensure 'sustainabilty' it needs to happen once the testimonial is over.
 
I must be in a minority then because I quite enjoyed the match. Yes, the lack of goals continues to frustrate but I thought it was an even, end to end game with lots of chances for both sides.

We all know how our lack of a goal scoring forward and therefore lack of killing games off has cost us massively, but I don't think it's because we're not trying. FWIW - and I know I've been critical in the past - I thought Walker had a very good first half yesterday, and Bonne continually wins headers but no-one seems to be detailed to play off those. Kendall looked sharp when he came on as well, so maybe he might be ready for a start on Monday. Hopper's biggest contribution to games for me seems to in defence, and his absence was evident in some poor clearances in the first half - he's also the one who usually will get a toe poke into the net if needed. I hate seeing someone who was so popular when here before being so roundly criticised.

This is undoubtedly the management team's biggest problem to solve over the close season.

Didn't really understand the changes yesterday, I'm a big fan of Coker's and maybe he was brought in as he's a bit more solid and likely to tackle than KAF, but Braintree didn't like it when we ran at them and I thought we missed that with KAF not getting a start. LCP was the one who shone in an attacking vein, numerous times making runs down the left, cutting in and ending with a few shots. Though it was the much maligned Jack Bridge who put in the best cross of the game late on. Odd little flashes from Husin but didn't really contribute much across the game, and, don't know what's happened to Morton lately, apart from one sublime ball across the pitch, his passing has been well off over the last few games, and I was surprised he wasn't replaced by Miley earlier. Seemed a bit pointless making that final substitution into injury time but will be really surprised if Miley doesn't start Monday.

I thought our defence did ok on the whole, and coped with the threat of Akinde, with Ralph winning far more headers than he did. With a player like Akinde you just need to let him know early on that you're not going to stand for his bullying antics, and we didn't do that so he was able to exploit that to some extent. Gus had a decent game, and I thought Ralph, Goodliffe and Taylor were all good, with Taylor the pick. I'd take Akinde or Kyrell Lisbie in a heartbeat, both the kind of exciting players we're currently missing, Lisbie was, for me, their best outfield player on the day. I know we've been in for Akinde in the past.

Lucky to survive a goal mouth melee, that Braintree really should have scored from, I do like Hayes but he does worry me at times, some good options shown in distribution. Harry Taylor just edged my MOTM from Leon, yet again a solid, combatative display including forays forward.

Hayes - 6.5
Gus - 7
Taylor - 8, MOTM
Goodliffe - 7
Ralph - 7.5
Morton - 6
Husin - 6.5
Coker - 6.5
LCP - 8
Bonne - 7
Walker - 7

Subs:
Bridge for Coker - 7
Kendall for Walker - 7
Hopper for Bonner - 6
KAF for Husin - n/a
Miley for Morton - n/a

I thought the ref on the whole had a fair game, though there were a couple of shouts for penalties, and a couple of very dodgy decisions (given by the west lino?). Some really blatant pull backs of shirts (one of those on Bonne in the box), none of which were picked up on, but he did get onto the Braintree keeper's time wasting early doors.
 
A really frustrating afternoon as we huffed and puffed but once again failed to break down the opponent, a dogged Braintree. I wonder where we would be now if we had seen out the Sutton game. It seems to have had a massive impact, putting us on the back foot and heaped the pressure on. Last 2 winnable home games we look wracked with fear unable to release the shackles and snatching at goal attempts. A massive attendance and Braintree showed the backs to the wall spirit we had last season. Only four subs and players going down with head injuries and Akinde doing his hammy. Now I know most of them were fake, the gk visibly laughing at the South after he went down trying to collect a cross and did not move for 30 seconds. The referee bought it all and Braintree knew it. Think that although dangerous on the break they will have second season syndrome of going down next year due to lack of resources. Much like Dorking last year and Ebbsfleet and Fylde this season.
Anyway onto us and clearly we do not deserve play offs and would not progress anyway, nobody will stop York. We may have lost the bigger teams in recent seasons but the pack have got stronger. Big big season next campaign, it is clear from this that a good start is essential. Many of the top seven have been there the whole campaign, had long runs of poor results but given themselves a buffer to keep in contention, Ala FGR, Oldham, Rochdale, Halifax & Gateshead.

Hayes 7
GSM 7.5
Taylor 7.5
Goodliffe 6.5
Ralph 7
Coker 5
Morton 6
Husin 5.5
LCP 8 MOTM
Bonne 6
Walker 6.5

Bridge 6.5
KAF 6
Kendall 6
Hopper 5
Miley 5

LCP my MOTM tried to create opportunities all game and understandably tired late on. Will be an asset next season after a full pre season and a tad more pace and strength. The rest, well defence looks okayish, add Golding to improve if possible. The rest needs some major surgery if we are to get promoted next season. UTB
 
if the budget was low, and we'd missed out on all our first choice signings then surely we should have just kept the core and really played the loan market instead of signing players that deep down they dont want....

Forwards are hit n miss as we know and can be crap at one club and flourish at another, but im pretty sure not many other teams would constantly persist with strikers with such incredibly low scoring stats.

If a loanee gets recalled then find another.....
Agreed...but it's finding another that's the issue.
Who's going to be available in January that's any cop; wants to come to an NL club, and can hit the ground running?
Remember, these loanees are going to be reserves, or players upgrading from lower divisions.
Can see the logic behind signing who we did. Pepple, Golding, and to some extent Goodliffe has worked out.
But a replacement for Bim? Even he needed a while to bed in. And from January, that time is limited.
 
Kendall should have come on for Husin, and we should have gone more attacking - taking 2 strikers off for 2 other strikers was pointless and I'm sorry, but the thought of another season with Hopper fills me with dread!

Also can't see the point of bringing Miley on, when we are pushing for a win - he sits deeper than the CBs!!!
To make sure we didn't concede in those final minutes and drop a point? Morton was barely putting in any effort by then.
 
After four seasons of Maherball i think it is reasonable to conclude that he has had enough opportunity to show his worth. One can list all kinds of excuses and justifications for his failure to restore the club to the Football League, but the fact remains we now face another year in the NL. As a player, he had a specific, limited role which worked because of other more creative spirits in the squad. As a manager, his style is exactly the same, keep possession, at all costs, and the other side can't score if we do that. Flair players do not fit in to this philosophy, nor do those not averse to shooting from a distance nor those who try to thread a pass through the middle. His penchant for playing favourites like Bridge, Miley and Husin has become s sick joke, the dropping of our player of the month yesterday was typical. Substitutions, the choice of and timings another weakness. Signing of strikers with a proven record of not being goalscorers. Failure to respond to events during a game where tactical tweaking is needed Conduct as the manager far from becoming.. I could go on. Surely COSU have seen enough to know what they should do even if it costs. For the long term and to ensure 'sustainabilty' it needs to happen once the testimonial is over.
Disagree, as you might expect.
For the record, it's not quite four seasons, and 'all kinds of excuses' is disingenuous. There's only one excuse: Ron, but it's a heck of a big one.
Even the NL saw that: hence manager of the season.
You're saying we don't want flair...seriously? I would add those who do shoot from distance are not very good. That Morton second-half effort is still behind the flats!
Miley does try a pass through the middle - when fit. Others are not very good doing so. But I doubt Kev tells them not to.
And criticism for a team that keeps the ball? I would say we miss speed and control, and as the latter is at a premium in this division, we really do need a speedster up front.
As for strikers with no track record, A little homework, please.
Check Bonne's stats. Yeah, he's not doing it for us, but 45 in 90 apps for Orient between 2017-19 is one in two. Hopper was one in three for us in his first spell.
I would agree I don't know why we signed him twice, but it ain't because of his track record.
 

ShrimperZone Sponsors

FFM MSPFX Foreign Exchange Services
Estuary Andys man club
Zone Advertisers Zone Advertisers

ShrimperZone - SUFC Player Sponsorship

Southend United Away Travel


All At Sea Fanzine


Back
Top