I doubt that either....I think he has borrowed all on the basis of the big picture with FF and Sainsbury's..
This is funding that wasn't available to SUFC without RM.
And without that funding we'd have been down the pan a lot earlier.
I doubt that either....I think he has borrowed all on the basis of the big picture with FF and Sainsbury's..
What exactly are the club's failings? If you take RM at his word he's pumped money into the club, not the other way round. We don't pay rent at Roots Hall and he said the club haven't paid a penny of the cost of getting planning permission at Fossetts Farm.
We have - in League One terms - good support
So why are we alone facing being liquidated in 9 days times? Why are we the only League One team that can't pay its players. Why are we - and not Orient, Colchester, Yeovil, Hartlepool etc etc- a financial basketcase
Are we the only League One that doesn't have a millionaire sugar daddy? Or is there another reason?
What exactly are the club's failings? If you take RM at his word he's pumped money into the club, not the other way round. We don't pay rent at Roots Hall and he said the club haven't paid a penny of the cost of getting planning permission at Fossetts Farm.
We have - in League One terms - good support
So why are we alone facing being liquidated in 9 days times? Why are we the only League One team that can't pay its players. Why are we - and not Orient, Colchester, Yeovil, Hartlepool etc etc- a financial basketcase
Are we the only League One that doesn't have a millionaire sugar daddy? Or is there another reason?
What exactly are the club's failings?
If you take RM at his word he's pumped money into the club, not the other way round. We don't pay rent at Roots Hall and he said the club haven't paid a penny of the cost of getting planning permission at Fossetts Farm.
We have - in League One terms - good support
So why are we alone facing being liquidated in 9 days times? Why are we the only League One team that can't pay its players. Why are we - and not Orient, Colchester, Yeovil, Hartlepool etc etc- a financial basketcase
I am lost as to how you think RM or his companies have pumped any monies at all into the club?
I love this quote that comes out every now and again...baring in mind RM owns the club and the ground etc etc ..what was he to do write a chq to himself when there is not any monies about in the first place. How can you charge yourself and expect a payment when you are both skint?
Look at the accounts. It is losing money.
Not as good as support as Leeds or Southampton, who have both been through the same thing we are going through despite crowds and incomes that dwarf ours.
We're not alone. There are plenty of other clubs who have gone through the same thing we have. Leeds and Southampton who I've already mentioned then there is Cardiff, Stockport, Luton, Palace, Bradford, Notts County, Exeter, QPR, Bournemouth, Rotherham, Portsmouth, Cambridge, Chester, Huddersfield, Leicester, Telford, Watford etc etc. Some clubs bigger than us, some clubs smaller than us, but all in or have been in the same sort of financial mess that we find ourselves in.
We may be at a different stage of the cycle to other teams, but it's not just us.
Where do you think the funds have come to cover the £2m loss last year and the one the year before?
Let's think how this rape analogy would work.
I think it would be a gang bang, because there is a group element to it with RM's group companies.
Looking at our group structure it is definitely RM's companies on top.
RM's companies have then pumped their liquidity into SUFC.
Where it falls down is on the issue of consent. The pumping of RM's liquidity into the club was done with the consent of the club, who actually welcomed it. It's not statutory rape because the club was nearly 100 years old.
Where the fans started complaining is when having pumped his load in, RM then withdraws because he's pumped everything in, leaving his financial **** all withered and small. The club then feels ashamed at being such a slag and so starts crying rape to put the blame elsewhere and cover up their own failings.
So in conclusion, he hasn't raped the club, he's merely ****ed the club, but the club was no virgin, it had already been ****ed before RM entered the scene......
Hope this helps
Beefy, I am not going to say either of you are right or wrong. All I would say is that in my experience accountants are bloody clever people and I believe there is such a thing as 'creative accounting'.
Firestorm is probably one of the few on here to be able to professionally comment on the accounts over the years and he has previously said that the club was loss making and relied on injections. However, despite all his 'detective work', I believe he still does not know the whole picture - does anyone other than RM and his accountants?
IIRC, some £1.9 million was used towards the unexpected cost of revised stadium plans and this came from the SUFC P+L, rather than the RHL one. Maybe Firestorm can confirm this if he has a moment. If this is correct, it seems to me that RM's plan was to use the taxman to fund these extraordinary costs until the stadium got the funding and then pay the taxman back at a later date. But what it appears to be to me and what is the reality could well be two completely different things.
Ultimately, what I don't like is the lack of transparency and I am disappointed that the Q+A session did not shed more light on these matters.
IIRC, some £1.9 million was used towards the unexpected cost of revised stadium plans and this came from the SUFC P+L, rather than the RHL one. Maybe Firestorm can confirm this if he has a moment. If this is correct,
I can't comment on that , as I don't know.
There is nothing in the accounts relating to 1.9M unexpected stadium plans and certainly no "extraordinary" expenditure shown in the accounts (which are only in the public domain tup to 31/7/08) However I do believe you may be confusing the administrative expenses shown in the accounts (07-08) at 2M as evidence of an extraordinary expense. Unfortunately, as I have mentioned before. This Item in the accounts has been at least 1.4M since 1994 (except for one year where dropped to 880k with what I believe was with "outside assistance" 1998 IIRC)
That simply isn't true. The Administrative expenses for 2007 were broken down in the finance forum and the figure for 2008 is broadly in line with 2007, which certainly suggests that we haven't suddenly shelled out the best part of £2m for developments on FF. RM has consistently said that the Club hasn't paid a penny for the development and there's nothing in the accounts (which were Independently Audited) which suggests otherwise.
I agree with some of what you've said. However, I have to take issue with the suggestion that the players don't work hard enough because they aren't being paid and that they are performing well below their potential. I don't see it myself. I don't think we are a particularly talented squad at the moment and the lineup has varied unbelievably. We have been vulnerable in defence for a good while now, long before the rumours of players not getting paid. Dervite papered over the cracks last year. Our midfield have lacked creativity all season and have been poor at getting forward and supporting the strikers, never mind scoring themselves. This has been due, in part, to Moussa's catastrophic loss of form (partly recovered before the sending off), the lack of decent loan players, our terrible disciplinary record and the smallest squad in the league that makes it difficult to deal with injuries. Our strike force (if it can be described as such) post-Barnard is the poorest I have seen since I began supporting the club with little pace, poor movement, no understanding of each other and no composure in front of goal. Again, the loan players have simply not delivered. I don't think it's due to lack of desire - I think the boys have tried - it's been due to a lack of ability, a small squad and a lack of money to remedy the problems. Ron Martin's 'false position' rhetoric is utter nonsense.Three years later, and the bubble has well and truly burst. We are now left in a mad situation where we have a chairman who says that relegation would be a disaster for the club, yet by not paying his own players, and dragging the club through a tax battle for the relatively small amount of £200K (compared to the circa £2.1M we paid just last November) he has well and truly been his own worst enemy as we are no longer able to attract players to the club, nor make the current ones feel like playing for the badge that has ripped them off on so many pay days now. Even if we were able to attract players, the tax battle he is embroiled in for no more than what looks like an act of bravado and stupidity to me, we couldn't sign them anyway due to the poxy embargo we are still under....Too late now anyway, the loan deadline is long gone!
Then we move onto Tilson. Whilst its clear that Ron Martin has lost faith in him deep down as he refuses to finance any signings, I have to play devils advocate here and admit that we have all commented on how ex-players are now doing so well (a'la Paynter, Harrold, Hoops)....Is it possible that whilst Tilson has a good eye for talent, he is not bringing the best out of his players? Maybe someone else might get more out of the squad we have.....Macca, Moussa, Laurent, Scannell, Francis, Grant, poss Spencer too all have potential to be so much more, and have shown this on the pitch on several occasions....Who actually believes that this team on paper is bad enough to go down when all cylinders are firing? I for one think that the team is at least mid to upper table ability. Tactics have also been discussed on here recently and their negativity at time....We also bemoan Tilsons late substitution decisions, a personal bug bear of mine.
I do not have the answers, and can only comment on what I see\believe. What I do know is that I am utterly disgusted at what we as fans are witnessing at the moment....A TOTAL season capitulation.....And if you ask me, Rons to blame, and Tilson is either not good enough, or has lost heart (probably the latter)....either way we need some sort of change, and pronto. I would prefer Ron gone.
(Ok, so wasn't so "in brief")
No-one ever batted an eyelid when he started systematically absorbing our non-playing assets one by one