• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

shafted

Kestrel

Exile
everything seems to be falling into place nicely . . . . anyone who cannot see that Ron has systematically raped our club of every financial asset and left us with what is essentially a squad of sub football league players needs a reality check

i don't give a **** what this bloke says - you can tell when he's lying because his lips move

R.I.P SUFC
 
Last edited by a moderator:
everything seems to be falling into place nicely . . . . anyone who cannot see that Ron has systematically raped our club of every financial asset and left us with what is essentially a squad of sub football league players needs a reality check

i don't give a **** what this bloke says - you can tell when he's lying because his lips move

R.I.P SUFC

How has he raped our club?

The flow of money (in the way of loans) has gone from RM's group companies to our club, not the other way round. What has screwed us is that that money has stopped.

Anyone who can't see that needs a reality check.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
However you look at it, this football club has been brought to it's knees and could cease to exist in a few weeks time.

The man in charge has to take the blame
 
Does someone need to explain the definition of raped to you?

Still, Martin is a ****, and needs to go, I can't see us getting promotion back up to league one with him in charge.
 
Still, Martin is a ****, and needs to go, I can't see us getting promotion back up to league one with him in charge.

I can't see us surviving much longer with Martin at the helm. If anyone has any ideas of how to oust him, I'd love to hear them.
 
I can't see us surviving much longer with Martin at the helm. If anyone has any ideas of how to oust him, I'd love to hear them.
trojan_horse_in_business_home_software.jpg
 
Does someone need to explain the definition of raped to you?

Still, Martin is a ****, and needs to go, I can't see us getting promotion back up to league one with him in charge.

Let's think how this rape analogy would work.

I think it would be a gang bang, because there is a group element to it with RM's group companies.

Looking at our group structure it is definitely RM's companies on top.

RM's companies have then pumped their liquidity into SUFC.

Where it falls down is on the issue of consent. The pumping of RM's liquidity into the club was done with the consent of the club, who actually welcomed it. It's not statutory rape because the club was nearly 100 years old.

Where the fans started complaining is when having pumped his load in, RM then withdraws because he's pumped everything in, leaving his financial **** all withered and small. The club then feels ashamed at being such a slag and so starts crying rape to put the blame elsewhere and cover up their own failings.

So in conclusion, he hasn't raped the club, he's merely ****ed the club, but the club was no virgin, it had already been ****ed before RM entered the scene......

Hope this helps
 
Let's think how this rape analogy would work.

I think it would be a gang bang, because there is a group element to it with RM's group companies.

Looking at our group structure it is definitely RM's companies on top.

RM's companies have then pumped their liquidity into SUFC.

Where it falls down is on the issue of consent. The pumping of RM's liquidity into the club was done with the consent of the club, who actually welcomed it. It's not statutory rape because the club was nearly 100 years old.

Where the fans started complaining is when having pumped his load in, RM then withdraws because he's pumped everything in, leaving his financial **** all withered and small. The club then feels ashamed at being such a slag and so starts crying rape to put the blame elsewhere and cover up their own failings.

So in conclusion, he hasn't raped the club, he's merely ****ed the club, but the club was no virgin, it had already been ****ed before RM entered the scene......

Hope this helps

I am lost as to how you think RM or his companies have pumped any monies at all into the club?
 
I am lost as to how you think RM or his companies have pumped any monies at all into the club?

It's paper money. The club has no assets that lenders are willing to lend on (hence no overdraft). RM has borrowed money secured on his group companies' assets and this has been the money that has kept us going when we've posting losses year after year.
 
It's paper money. The club has no assets that lenders are willing to lend on (hence no overdraft). RM has borrowed money secured on his group companies' assets and this has been the money that has kept us going when we've posting losses year after year.


I doubt that either....I think he has borrowed all on the basis of the big picture with FF and Sainsbury's..
 
Let's think how this rape analogy would work.

I think it would be a gang bang, because there is a group element to it with RM's group companies.

Looking at our group structure it is definitely RM's companies on top.

RM's companies have then pumped their liquidity into SUFC.

Where it falls down is on the issue of consent. The pumping of RM's liquidity into the club was done with the consent of the club, who actually welcomed it. It's not statutory rape because the club was nearly 100 years old.

Where the fans started complaining is when having pumped his load in, RM then withdraws because he's pumped everything in, leaving his financial **** all withered and small. The club then feels ashamed at being such a slag and so starts crying rape to put the blame elsewhere and cover up their own failings.

So in conclusion, he hasn't raped the club, he's merely ****ed the club, but the club was no virgin, it had already been ****ed before RM entered the scene......

Hope this helps

What exactly are the club's failings? If you take RM at his word he's pumped money into the club, not the other way round. We don't pay rent at Roots Hall and he said the club haven't paid a penny of the cost of getting planning permission at Fossetts Farm.
We have - in League One terms - good support

So why are we alone facing being liquidated in 9 days times? Why are we the only League One team that can't pay its players. Why are we - and not Orient, Colchester, Yeovil, Hartlepool etc etc- a financial basketcase

Are we the only League One that doesn't have a millionaire sugar daddy? Or is there another reason?
 

ShrimperZone Sponsors

FFM MSPFX Foreign Exchange Services
Estuary MFF2
Zone Advertisers Zone Advertisers

ShrimperZone - SUFC Player Sponsorship

Southend United Away Travel


All At Sea Fanzine


Back
Top