Interpol Shrimper
Member
Where is the 'couldn't give a toss' option? :rolleyes:
Cue lots of red against this post :D
Where is the 'couldn't give a toss' option? :rolleyes:
Get a room the pair of you..:p
Cue lots of red against this post :D
A cheap shot, but here goes........
You know it'd never work. I'd make us a nice paella, open a bottle of Chardonnay and pop on Vera Lynn on the Gramophone and you'd storm off in a huff.
Let it go!
*Edited for Truth purposes*.
I'd also favour reducing everyone's rep by 95% rather than resetting to zero, so not to let people off the hook for their past indiscretions.
If that's easily do-able, it gets my vote!
No it's not!!
:thump:
Resetting rep is not exactly an easy feat - so to add having to make mathematical calculations while you're about it is doubly difficult...!
Matt
I think the SZFC lot should start bullying people again ... !!
:rolleyes:
Maybe we'll let you do that again for a week before they clear the historic rep totals? :D
I think the SZFC lot should start bullying people again ... !!
:rolleyes:
Actually, Cricko, did you start this ages ago and you keep winning it?
Why don't you reset it at the end of every month?
That way we could have a Zoner Of The Month Award and a Hall of Fame and an inevitable Zoner Of The Month curse that would see the winners subsequently writing bobbins for the following two weeks
Actually, Cricko, did you start this ages ago and you keep winning it?
No I dont remember that Ian .but that isnt a bad idea...Maybe not monthly but 3 or six monthly? We could award the winners a yearly Job writing for some cheap tabloid magazine in Singapore.;)
Perhaps a decent solution to the giving of rep would be to give one point each time someone is repped and take away one point when they're neg repped. Then at least you'd get a better representation of how respected the poster's opinions are rather than how many times the top-ranked posters have repped them...