It's not as big as Rome and I wasn't on that job eitherWould take longer than that
Portsmouth are in league 1 with an average gate of 3times ours at present.First and foremost, if you were conducting a feasibility study for possible development sites right now, Fossetts Farm would be pretty low down on the list. It just isn't a good location.
The position that redevelopment of Roots Hall is financially unsustainable is just wrong. Portsmouth is about a good a parallel as you will get - in fact, the ground is significantly older and some areas were in significantly worse condition than Roots Hall.
Exactly, it's not that difficult, it's just RM who has convinced people that the only way possible was FF , a new over built east stand followed by the west stand over a few years, north stand stays as a more than adequate away stand, I'd change south stand lower to semi standing !Lots of clubs redevelop a stand at a time
Not sure how their average attendance correlates with the point that the redevelopment profiles of the two stadia are almost identical...Portsmouth are in league 1 with an average gate of 3times ours at present.
It’s unsustainable because it leaves us with a significant debt and we’re loss making at present
I voted for Roots Hall redevelopment. Don’t fancy FF never did and to my complete shame I haven’t got a clue what the third option ‘Bart’ actually means. It’s been in countless polls before but I’ve never taken the tSurprised RH is winning by such a large margin.
Don't get me wrong, I love the place, it has so much character compared to modern stadiums, but let's face it: it's decrepit, is a safety hazard, parking is awful, facilities are poor and, I'm no expert, but I imagine it would be very difficult to redevelop to the standard required. It must be one of the oldest stadiums in the country, and it's showing.
We need a new stadium if the club is to progress and also attract new fans.
If others are like me, then we're voting for a new improved Roots Hall
A guy on this forum who takes delapedated football stadiums. Then he can miraculously polish them up all nice and shiny. And it all works out lovely. And he does this for a living? How many stadiums has he done?To be fair there is somebody on the forum who actually does this for a living who says it is possible. So with due respect i take his opinion over anyones on this matter.
More than Ron and everyone else on the zone I would hazard a guess.A guy on this forum who takes delapedated football stadiums. Then he can miraculously polish them up all nice and shiny. And it all works out lovely. And he does this for a living? How many stadiums has he done?
Quite a few I think, but definitely Colchester’s new ground and currently Fratton Park.A guy on this forum who takes delapedated football stadiums. Then he can miraculously polish them up all nice and shiny. And it all works out lovely. And he does this for a living? How many stadiums has he done?
I never said they were different. I have little interest in the specific details of the fratton park redevelopment and will trust your expertise.Not sure how their average attendance correlates with the point that the redevelopment profiles of the two stadia are almost identical...
Probably too many to list on here, and that doesn't include all of the temporary venues we build on the likes of the Olympics, Wimbledon, T20 etc...A guy on this forum who takes delapedated football stadiums. Then he can miraculously polish them up all nice and shiny. And it all works out lovely. And he does this for a living? How many stadiums has he done?
I never said they were different. I have little interest in the specific details of the fratton park redevelopment and will trust your expertise.
My point is that Portsmouth are a well run league club with a significant fan base and it makes sense that they look to redevelop their very old ground. They have a billionaire owner who is doing a good job and therefore they have access to the capital needed, along with the ability to pay for it over the longer term.
I think our situation is very different. We all believe in the potential of this club, but if the redevelopments are similar then i expect the costs are similar and for us it’d therefore be a much bigger risk, as we’re two leagues lower with hardly any assets and a smaller fanbase.
Don’t forget the boat down to GillinghamI voted for a redeveloped RH.
Travel arrangements are more beneficial, two railway stations within walking distance plus easy from the airport for our future European games!
Colchester was a new stadium not a re vamp. Portsmouth wanted to move to a new stadium but we're forced to re vamp the ground because of location and council problems. Their ideal plan was to move and build houses on the original site.Quite a few I think, but definitely Colchester’s new ground and currently Fratton Park.
Would you like to share some of your ideas, as it sounds like you know more about my background than I do, so can only deduce from this that you are an industry professional...Colchester was a new stadium not a re vamp. Portsmouth wanted to move to a new stadium but we're forced to re vamp the ground because of location and council problems. Their ideal plan was to move and build houses on the original site.