Ricky Otto
President⭐
Didn't bore me KS, I appreciate this kinda thing. The one thing I around formations is that people assume that they need to be exactly symmetrical. They don't. The team we are discussing is a good example where Worrall can play much wider in front of the more defensive full-back of White. Timlin can tuck in to compete in a more central position and allow the more attacking fullback, Coker, to push on.
We have done this before when I think the 4 midfielders were Mkandawire, Hurst, Timlin & Laird. Hurst being the 'wider' player of the 4.
I get your point that formations don't necessarily have to be symetrical but a certain level of dicipline is needed. A scenario where Worrall has commited himself up the pitch and Timlin has come in to compensate for that leaves us very narrow if the opposition counter. I think any of the front 3 given freedom is fine as our defensive shape isn't affected, perhaps I am splitting hairs as sometimes you need to take these gambles and it doesn't seem a ridiculous idea to me, I just have my reservations. That said I can't see Phil going for it for the very reasons I have mentioned.