I did write the right thing didn't I? And I wasn't referring to that defunct pop group either!
Hearsay rather than heresay.
Look, the Sky article clearly says there has been interest from a number of Championship clubs. If you don’t go up and he gets a suitable offer he will leave. Many on here told me there was no chance we would get Eastwood but it was inevitable. In the same way, we will lose Kightly or Hennessey if the money is offered by a bigger club. We were alerted to Bailey by Elokobi's agent, who also represents the Ginger Gerrard. Whether or not we will get him is another matter. QPR can outspend us now – but we have the advantage that you want to sign Mulgrew.
why would we even be contemplating selling our best player for such a miniscule fee and a player Wolves don't want?
It's hardly far away from London, Southend.seems quite happy hear from what i read? but isn't he from london? so hence wouldnt he want to move back there?
Look, the Sky article clearly says there has been interest from a number of Championship clubs. If you don’t go up and he gets a suitable offer he will leave. Many on here told me there was no chance we would get Eastwood but it was inevitable. In the same way, we will lose Kightly or Hennessey if the money is offered by a bigger club. We were alerted to Bailey by Elokobi's agent, who also represents the Ginger Gerrard. Whether or not we will get him is another matter. QPR can outspend us now – but we have the advantage that you want to sign Mulgrew.
Look, the Sky article clearly says there has been interest from a number of Championship clubs. If you don’t go up and he gets a suitable offer he will leave. Many on here told me there was no chance we would get Eastwood but it was inevitable. In the same way, we will lose Kightly or Hennessey if the money is offered by a bigger club. We were alerted to Bailey by Elokobi's agent, who also represents the Ginger Gerrard. Whether or not we will get him is another matter. QPR can outspend us now – but we have the advantage that you want to sign Mulgrew.
At that price, no chance. I don't think Mulgrew is worth that much to Wolves and we could probably get him for something fairly nominal if we want him.
Bailey I would say is worth somewhere between 600 and 800k
And personally, I can't see Bailey being the type of player to get in the hump about it, or let his performance be affected by bids being rejected. He seems to be a down to earth guy, and with Tillys convincing skills that Hammell went on about I can see Bailey staying, whether we go up, or not. It depends on the length of his contract though.Thats the big problem though isnt it, in this division he is probably worth that ammount, but imagine how much the eqivalent (sp) championship midfielder of his undoubted talent would fetch.... upwards of 1.5 to 2 mill i reckon, thats why i dont believe Ron would sell him.
And personally, I can't see Bailey being the type of player to get in the hump about it, or let his performance be affected by bids being rejected. He seems to be a down to earth guy, and with Tillys convincing skills that Hammell went on about I can see Bailey staying, whether we go up, or not. It depends on the length of his contract though.
You were fairly respectable when you were on here in the summer re Eastwood, but lately, you've really been giving it the Billy Big Bollocks.
Bailey should be going nowhere. Firstly, he loves it here. Secondly, there's no way we'd sell him after a year when we don't need or want to. Thirdly, Wolves have shown that they seem intent on destroying the careers of Southend's best players by buying thm and letting them rot on the bench. Fourthly, Wolves have shown that they have little chance of escaping the Championship and we may well be playing them, if not next season, then the following one.
So.......**** OFF AND GO LOOK SOMEWHERE ELSE :madman: :punch:
We are NOT, and never will be, a feeder for bloody Wolverhampton Wanderers, of all clubs :thump: