• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

National Service

National Service


  • Total voters
    43
I don't want to go back to Afghanistan and stand next to someone who was forced to join the Armed Forces. He or she would, regardless of training, be a liability to themselves, and their colleagues.

Something however, like enforced community service would be far better, and I believe it is something that David Cameron supports.

Besides. If you bring in National Service to sort out the yob culture of this country, is the best option training them how to use a variety of weapons, and how to kill? It might have worked 50 years ago, but IMO, would not work today.


As for the point about the amount of young people who are out of work- look at joining the military. Join the Navy, and you really will see the world. Join the RAF, and well, yea, don't do that. Join the Army and you will be the best.
 
I never cease to be amazed by the amount of people who think the way stop anti-social behaviour is to get the "youth of today" in the army. Have they never seen squaddies on a night out?

Admittedly sending them to Afghanistan would be one way to reduce the problem, because a fair few would come back in coffins.

Alternatively you could send them off to guard penguins in the Falklands.
 
National as in military service? No. However, like a lot of the other posters on here, I think some form of 'civic' service would be a good idea.
It could be almost anything; working at a library, painting council properties, working for the police, doing charity stuff.
As for the point made earlier about when to fit it in, that is not a difficult issue to overcome. Most people would probably choose to do it as early as possible, but make it compulsory to have completed it by, say, 25.
If the Tories (or indeed any party) put this in their manifesto it would be a big vote winner. Not least because those who will have to do this service won't be able to vote themselves yet. Ha!
 
I wouldn't want most of the cretinous wimps we call our youth ruining the good name of our armed forces, but I would wholeheartedly support a program where 'service' meant service to our nation, whether it be cleaning the streets or teaching young kids. We live in a culture of entitlement and immediate gratification that has every two bob yob thinking they're owed whatever they desire, resulting in them tap dancing on some poor innocent's face when they don't get it.

Agree 100%

Either that means I'm becoming more right wing, which I doubt. It could mean Rusty's becoming more left wing, which I doubt even more. Or it could simply mean that this isn't an issue that is a case of a right or left wing opinion but just absolute common sense.

There is a growing culture of 'the world owes me' and it's behind many of the problems we see. That's not all young people by any means, I think as a whole they have been demonised by certain sections of the press unfairly. However there are enough of them for this to be a real serious issue. We need to make people realise that if they are getting something from society they have to contribute to it too.
 
Agree 100%

Either that means I'm becoming more right wing, which I doubt. It could mean Rusty's becoming more left wing, which I doubt even more. Or it could simply mean that this isn't an issue that is a case of a right or left wing opinion but just absolute common sense.

There is a growing culture of 'the world owes me' and it's behind many of the problems we see. That's not all young people by any means, I think as a whole they have been demonised by certain sections of the press unfairly. However there are enough of them for this to be a real serious issue. We need to make people realise that if they are getting something from society they have to contribute to it too.

Totally agree , and just saw Michael Caine on this morning explaining what he mean by national service . He doesn't agree with becoming a solider as he explained he is now a pacifist , but making his new film helped him to realise that the kids he meet have been rejected by socity they live in , as he said you build cages for people to live in they becomes animals . He also said he was in a gang when he was their age and you dont join ganags to look for fights you do it to protect yourself form them. Its a lost generation that needs guidance . But all we ever do is try to bring in extreme left or right generalisations that never work because they dont take into account people are individuals . Your not an extention of your emperor/empress god/PM socialist director/dictator , you are a person able to choose where you wish to life .

And in a disgraceful way we have lost generations because we try to impose a one size fits all solution as we have with society and business . We've tried to make people profitable or ergonomic rather then people.

There is no War this is a rescue mission
 
Totally agree , and just saw Michael Caine on this morning explaining what he mean by national service . He doesn't agree with becoming a solider as he explained he is now a pacifist , but making his new film helped him to realise that the kids he meet have been rejected by socity they live in , as he said you build cages for people to live in they becomes animals . He also said he was in a gang when he was their age and you dont join ganags to look for fights you do it to protect yourself form them. Its a lost generation that needs guidance . But all we ever do is try to bring in extreme left or right generalisations that never work because they dont take into account people are individuals . Your not an extention of your emperor/empress god/PM socialist director/dictator , you are a person able to choose where you wish to life .

And in a disgraceful way we have lost generations because we try to impose a one size fits all solution as we have with society and business . We've tried to make people profitable or ergonomic rather then people.

There is no War this is a rescue mission

I agree with you to an extent, in that the ‘one size fits all’ solution to problems like this just doesn’t work, but my contention is that the approach that’s currently being used is in line with your belief that the hooligans are the victims. I’m not buying that. If you gave these little *******s acres of green space (or role playing games, as you suggested in an earlier thread), they’ll just trash them and laugh at the well-meaning hippy who’s trying to help them.

The only approach that will work is the old fashioned carrot and stick. We need to give people realistic aspirations that they can escape poverty by working hard, and that will only come by reforming the enabling benefit culture and providing real education and discipline in our schools. Someone who busts their *** working a low paid job needs to be perceivably better off than someone who just sits on theirs. The hard working and honest members of our society need to be lionized rather than regarded as ‘mugs’.

That’s the carrot part, now comes the stick. I’m sure many of you saw Panorama on Monday night, which recounted stories of vicious assaults that were ‘punished’ with a caution. We’re all aware of the horrendous tale of the double suicide of the mother and her mentally disabled daughter – pushed to the very edge by animals who know that they can get away with whatever they like. These are the victims, not the feral vermin who torment the decent and unassuming folk of our once great land. There needs to be the threat of real and awful punishment for the jumped up ayatollahs of sink estates. It’s not the cages that make the people feel like they’re living in zoos, it’s the animals who are allowed to act as the zookeepers whilst our police force spends its time ensuring quotas are filled and motorists are fleeced.

We need to give people the tools to succeed, and the environment where their success will be rewarded. Granting the status of victim to those that victimize won’t achieve that.
 
I agree with you to an extent, in that the ‘one size fits all’ solution to problems like this just doesn’t work, but my contention is that the approach that’s currently being used is in line with your belief that the hooligans are the victims. I’m not buying that. If you gave these little *******s acres of green space (or role playing games, as you suggested in an earlier thread), they’ll just trash them and laugh at the well-meaning hippy who’s trying to help them.

The only approach that will work is the old fashioned carrot and stick. We need to give people realistic aspirations that they can escape poverty by working hard, and that will only come by reforming the enabling benefit culture and providing real education and discipline in our schools. Someone who busts their *** working a low paid job needs to be perceivably better off than someone who just sits on theirs. The hard working and honest members of our society need to be lionized rather than regarded as ‘mugs’.

That’s the carrot part, now comes the stick. I’m sure many of you saw Panorama on Monday night, which recounted stories of vicious assaults that were ‘punished’ with a caution. We’re all aware of the horrendous tale of the double suicide of the mother and her mentally disabled daughter – pushed to the very edge by animals who know that they can get away with whatever they like. These are the victims, not the feral vermin who torment the decent and unassuming folk of our once great land. There needs to be the threat of real and awful punishment for the jumped up ayatollahs of sink estates. It’s not the cages that make the people feel like they’re living in zoos, it’s the animals who are allowed to act as the zookeepers whilst our police force spends its time ensuring quotas are filled and motorists are fleeced.

We need to give people the tools to succeed, and the environment where their success will be rewarded. Granting the status of victim to those that victimize won’t achieve that.


We also need to pay for such a program.

I suspect either:

The money saved by cutting handouts would not be enough to pay for such a program

or

The predicted benefits would not be seen in an acceptable period of time - i.e. in time to get the implementing Government re-elected.

My guess is that governments don't want to take on such a program and I suspect it may be cheaper/easier just to pay people to do nothing and rot.
 
I agree with you to an extent, in that the ‘one size fits all’ solution to problems like this just doesn’t work, but my contention is that the approach that’s currently being used is in line with your belief that the hooligans are the victims. I’m not buying that. If you gave these little *******s acres of green space (or role playing games, as you suggested in an earlier thread), they’ll just trash them and laugh at the well-meaning hippy who’s trying to help them.

Was actually table top miniature war games but ill let you off ;) . Its teh degree to their crimes , as you say they all hooligans , well what level . Shop lifters , hangers on to the group becuase lack of awareness and understanding of themslves which is the massive problem of being a teenager (i mean who here even had a vague understanding of who they were at 12+ !) Michael Cane also sensible said that the kids had not been given a system to work in . Money was chucked at them , and of course it got eaten up . The social workers who could help them the groups that would take those kids who you can help (and they are the majority , remember humans are a pack mentality if a big alpha male calls and attrachs overs they will come running ) . He also sensible stated teh decline in a father figure and id go further and say a string male and female roles are missing (this is not always mother and father , as remember WWII and after alot of that generation were rasied by aunts uncles and grannies ! Also with your Jewish background you know the value of family)


The only approach that will work is the old fashioned carrot and stick. We need to give people realistic aspirations that they can escape poverty by working hard, and that will only come by reforming the enabling benefit culture and providing real education and discipline in our schools. Someone who busts their *** working a low paid job needs to be perceivably better off than someone who just sits on theirs. The hard working and honest members of our society need to be lionized rather than regarded as ‘mugs’.

But this is a one size fits all solution again . Carrot and stick work for some , a cuddle and kind words work for others . Its a discipline system that works for the individual, you have to discover this they are still people . And worest of all kids who have not been taught, so the adults have failed.


That’s the carrot part, now comes the stick. I’m sure many of you saw Panorama on Monday night, which recounted stories of vicious assaults that were ‘punished’ with a caution. We’re all aware of the horrendous tale of the double suicide of the mother and her mentally disabled daughter – pushed to the very edge by animals who know that they can get away with whatever they like. These are the victims, not the feral vermin who torment the decent and unassuming folk of our once great land. There needs to be the threat of real and awful punishment for the jumped up ayatollahs of sink estates. It’s not the cages that make the people feel like they’re living in zoos, it’s the animals who are allowed to act as the zookeepers whilst our police force spends its time ensuring quotas are filled and motorists are fleeced.

Its is cages that make them , i agree its disguisting what they did , had there also been a closer community people whould have stoped this dead . Education , removal of key kids the group . We're thinking to much of a mob as a single creature its not , gangs arnt a terrifying monster of titan legend its driven by individuals . You find who its heart is who its brains are and remove them . Why does it even exisit. Then you know what kind of discipline to install or training to prevent its creation.

We need to give people the tools to succeed, and the environment where their success will be rewarded. Granting the status of victim to those that victimize won’t achieve that.

The first part i agree with the second not so much their all in need of assistance . You defend those who cant protect themselves and remove the capacity to make war from those who will.

Ask you Rabbi the difference between Din and Geburah and which is the better of teh two.
 
My guess is that governments don't want to take on such a program and I suspect it may be cheaper/easier just to pay people to do nothing and rot.

Sadly true , a "money fixes problems" . Get a time and efficiency person in to rationalise a system to care for people.
 
The first part i agree with the second not so much their all in need of assistance . You defend those who cant protect themselves and remove the capacity to make war from those who will.

Ask you Rabbi the difference between Din and Geburah and which is the better of teh two.

I know my way around the Sephirot thank you very little.

And a cuddle ain't the answer.
 
When would they be able to fit it in?
If they leave school at 16 then I can't see why they shouldn't but it is their choice, they won't work as hard as they can if they don't want to be there and will ruin the atmosphere for the ones who do want to be there.
Other students leave at 18 and go straight to Uni until they're in their 20's and if they went straight into national service they would forget some of the stuff they'd learnt and wouldn't be able to get the job they want.

I believe the school leaving age has been raised to 18 for all next years school year 7 (someone on here might know have the exact date). It will be interesting to see how some of the children that would have left at 16 enjoy & get on with another 2 years of school/college.

At the moment I would imagine most children in 6th form or at college want to be there & enjoy a more relaxed learning environment. But I wonder if some of that will be ruined by as you point out the ones that dont want to be there.
 
I believe the school leaving age has been raised to 18 for all next years school year 7 (someone on here might know have the exact date). It will be interesting to see how some of the children that would have left at 16 enjoy & get on with another 2 years of school/college.

At the moment I would imagine most children in 6th form or at college want to be there & enjoy a more relaxed learning environment. But I wonder if some of that will be ruined by as you point out the ones that dont want to be there.
Exactly, now while obviously most people would rather not be doing any kind of work at that age, but the people that are there want to be there, they aren't going to muck around as much as other students would.
I think the best thing to do would be to give students the choice at 16 years of 2 years work; in the armed services or charity work or some of the forms of work mentioned above, or another 2 years of college.
That way the people who want to learn are learning and those who don't can get into work and help others at the same time.
 
I agree with you to an extent, in that the ‘one size fits all’ solution to problems like this just doesn’t work, but my contention is that the approach that’s currently being used is in line with your belief that the hooligans are the victims. I’m not buying that. If you gave these little *******s acres of green space (or role playing games, as you suggested in an earlier thread), they’ll just trash them and laugh at the well-meaning hippy who’s trying to help them.

The only approach that will work is the old fashioned carrot and stick. We need to give people realistic aspirations that they can escape poverty by working hard, and that will only come by reforming the enabling benefit culture and providing real education and discipline in our schools. Someone who busts their *** working a low paid job needs to be perceivably better off than someone who just sits on theirs. The hard working and honest members of our society need to be lionized rather than regarded as ‘mugs’.

That’s the carrot part, now comes the stick. I’m sure many of you saw Panorama on Monday night, which recounted stories of vicious assaults that were ‘punished’ with a caution. We’re all aware of the horrendous tale of the double suicide of the mother and her mentally disabled daughter – pushed to the very edge by animals who know that they can get away with whatever they like. These are the victims, not the feral vermin who torment the decent and unassuming folk of our once great land. There needs to be the threat of real and awful punishment for the jumped up ayatollahs of sink estates. It’s not the cages that make the people feel like they’re living in zoos, it’s the animals who are allowed to act as the zookeepers whilst our police force spends its time ensuring quotas are filled and motorists are fleeced.

We need to give people the tools to succeed, and the environment where their success will be rewarded. Granting the status of victim to those that victimize won’t achieve that.

Once again, in 100% agreement!
 
No....

If I get this right, part of the reason people want National Service brought back is to install some discipline into the youth of today. In other words, you get all the thugs and teach them how to use weapons and kill people.
 
No....

If I get this right, part of the reason people want National Service brought back is to install some discipline into the youth of today. In other words, you get all the thugs and teach them how to use weapons and kill people.

I think we digressed from military service to some sort of community based scheme, because it's clear that the miltary is not the answer for many people. I think that's worth considering.
 

ShrimperZone Sponsors

FFM MSPFX Foreign Exchange Services
Estuary MFF2
Zone Advertisers Zone Advertisers

ShrimperZone - SUFC Player Sponsorship

Southend United Away Travel


All At Sea Fanzine


Back
Top