I'll stick with a Floyd stoppage though, either catching McGregor early with the check-hook, or waiting til McGregor empties the tank & Floyd breaks his heart & the ref waves it off after several unanswered shots.
This guy knows
I'll stick with a Floyd stoppage though, either catching McGregor early with the check-hook, or waiting til McGregor empties the tank & Floyd breaks his heart & the ref waves it off after several unanswered shots.
This guy knows
It's been quiet here! would like to hear GBJ and Ricey's opinions on Joshua v Fury in 2018? Will it happen?
It's been quiet here! would like to hear GBJ and Ricey's opinions on Joshua v Fury in 2018? Will it happen?
Doesn't seem a lot of interest in boxing talk lately, so I've stepped away.
Who knows with Joshua-Fury. I think it will happen eventually, but next year is too soon for Fury IMO. He's been out of the game for too long now, and would need at least 3-4 warm-up fights, before facing Joshua. His lifestyle hasn't been clean, he hasn't stayed sharp in the gym, he's just been living the good life. You can't climb off of the couch & jump into the ring against a dangerous opponent like Joshua.
On top of that, is the weight factor. He's been walking around at close to 30-stone, which is ridiculous. He needs to be around the 18-stone mark, which is his optimal fighting weight, IMO.
And what the fight really come down to, is if Fury actually still has the fire inside him. If he's looking to fight Joshua for the payday, I'd rather he stayed retired. No fighter on this planet is currently able to climb off of the couch after 2 years of inactivity, shed 10-stone, and jump into the ring & fight competitively against Joshua. No one at all.
Personally, I'd book Tyson's path like this;
March 2018: 6-rounder, against a domestic opponent
May 2018: 10-rounder against a European opponent
Sept/Oct 2018: 12-rounder against a fringe World level fighter (Dillian Whyte would make a decent domestic event)
March 2019: 12-rounder against a live opponent (someone like Joe Parker would be ideal, although Pulev or Povetkin would be more likely)
late summer 2019: Face the winner of the Joshua/Wilder fight
I'm away in the Falklands so my internet access is very limited. My access to live boxing events on TV on the other hand is exceptional and with the time difference it's a lot easier for me. I haven't missed a fight since getting out here on the 24th of August. Even the fights like Butler v Hall, its keeping me entertained and something I don't always get the time for at home.
GGG v Canelo, what a fight ruined by the shocking scoring of 118-110, if she had have scored that something closer then you could forgive the result. People are more annoyed about it because of such a wide decision. I personally had GGG winning by 2 rounds. But I would not have been surprised before they read the results if it was called a draw. It makes a second fight more exciting and hopefully it happens after I get back from this **** hole because i'm going to try and go.
As for Joshua, if the Tyson Fury of 2015 comes back then I would love to see that fight in a flash as that would be a really good watch. And for me that Fury wins like he did against Klitschko, he wins inside and outside of the ring. I totally agree with GBJ on his comeback path, but unfortunately I cannot see Fury wanting to go down that path I just hope Peter or whoever is guiding him when he decides to come back directs him in the right way.
All this Sky Sports ******** to sell their man saying the heavyweight division is rife with talent grips me. Joshua is the best the division has to offer and the rest would be average journeymen in an era rife with heavyweight greats. Wilder hasn't really proved himself and doesn't get that chance too because of Ortiz failing yet another drugs test. Parker isn't all that and Hughie just wasn't quite ready to take on someone like Parker. Haye is passed it, Bellew isn't a heavyweight. Whyte is average at best, he is European level along with Chisora. Daniel Dubois is young and could be a decent fighter but we won't know until he is actually tested. It's a poor division and Joshua is made to look greater by the poorness of the division as a whole. If Ortiz and Povetkin stopped jabbing themselves maybe it would be a little more exciting. Unfortunately Klitschko's retirement weakened the division and the only exciting thing that could happen is the return of the 2015 Fury, which unfortunately I cannot see happening.
Is this the same Hearn who runs the PDC darts organisation .?
Joshua clearly won every round but there was no way he was going to knock Takam out and the stoppage was disappointing, Takam never looked shook or unsteady from any of the shots that landed. Think it was a decision for Joshua to keep his 100% KO record.
It seems the words of Joshua have woken the beast and Fury has come out and said he wants the fight and is serious about a comeback! How many times have we heard that from him in the past year, i'll believe it when I see it but I am hoping and praying he comes back and as the great champion he was.
More strange things coming to light about the whole Tyson Fury situation....
UKAD (UK Anti-Doping) origionally claimed Tyson had failed drug tests. It was the reason for the BBBoC indefinitely suspending his licence, until the matter had been cleared up. That's the story we were told.
Today, a claim has emerged, that UKAD still can't, and possibly couldn't ever actually prove Tyson had done anything wrong. The claim is that they are now scared to "clear" Tyson's name, as it could result in him suing them for loss of earnings, with the figure bandied about being £15m, (based on £5m per fight, & missing 3 fights over the past 2 years) and UKAD only get £8m per year funding. If the legal action were successful in Fury's favour, UKAD would need a government bailout & a new pair of pants.
So, could there truly be something fishy going on here? lets examine the facts; this has dragged on for 2 years. Tyson to this day has not been found guilty of anything, he hasn't been punished or sentenced. There hasn't been any hearings. He's simply been accused of guilt & left in the dark.
Could your boss at work suspend you indefinitely, without any explanation, proof or due process?
Has this situation ever occurred, with any other athlete in UKAD history?
Could you honestly imagine this happening to AJ?
For all the good stuff the UKAD agency do, they certainly haven't shone here, & I suspect this won't be the last we've heard on this case.