I don’t disagree, I’m a huge Fury fan. He’s a 6ft 9 version of Usyk.He can do what he likes. He's the best.
I don’t disagree, I’m a huge Fury fan. He’s a 6ft 9 version of Usyk.He can do what he likes. He's the best.
It was embarrassing!Joshua’s head is gone .That was cringey. Usyk didn’t look impressed either. The line “how did you beat me”, was such a condescending yet telling one. A man who has thrown everything at it, failed, & subsequently knows the end (of his reputation/draw) is near.
Personally I thought it was a close fight. I didn’t score it, but it was clear that Usyk edged it.
Joshua still has options. Wilder? Fury? He won’t retire, I don’t think, but after that emotional display who knows. His head is gone.
I disagree, I think he will have lost a lot of interest from the casuals who help to bring in the money. It was very reminiscent of McGregor’s post fight interview in the ring against Dustin Poirier. He lost a lot of fans and reputation after that.AJ just added about 50mil to his next fight. Smart guy
Because boxing has and always will be like this. There are no set rules for scoring a fight and it can be ‘what a judge likes’, which is wrong! There should be a set criteria to follow but unfortunately there isn’t and we have incidents like this. If you fancy seeing a robbery Josh Taylor vs Jack Catterall, even with the commentary on they have Catterall as the winner, judges saw it the other way!I wanted AJ to win, but he clearly lost. How was that a split decision? Some of these judges are useless and untrustworthy. His speech at the end was like from one of those people that have smoked too much weed in their life. It was nuts and all over the place. I watched it on an android box, so got Dazn instead of Sky, and had American commentators. They also spoke a load of wotsit, I turned the volume off by round 8.
Yes, I commented on that fight on here. Another reason I said some of these judges are useless and untrustworthy.Because boxing has and always will be like this. There are no set rules for scoring a fight and it can be ‘what a judge likes’, which is wrong! There should be a set criteria to follow but unfortunately there isn’t and we have incidents like this. If you fancy seeing a robbery Josh Taylor vs Jack Catterall, even with the commentary on they have Catterall as the winner, judges saw it the other way!
As for commentary, AJ is a DAZN fighter, I don’t know who was on DAZN comms as I had the Sky idiots Smith and Macklin. Who I thought were pretty fair to be honest, however a lot of people on social media saying they were bias towards Usyk because AJ left Sky. You will often find that the home fighter or the fighter that is favoured by the broadcaster is talked up every time they throw a punch regardless of hit, miss or hitting the gloves.
You could hear at points in the arena, when AJ was throwing the crowd were going wild for him hitting fresh air! A lot of his punches his the gloves but the crowd loved it. Of course it’s hard to tell when you’re sat in the gods and watching on a little screen.
Boxing can be worse than football at times it’s very tribal and decisions and support is very biased.
Pretty much every week up and down the country and around the world there are dodgy scorecards! Sometimes they get overlooked because you get the right result.Yes, I commented on that fight on here. Another reason I said some of these judges are useless and untrustworthy.