To be honest, with the new found strength in depth of the squad we should be putting out a "second" string squad able to go all guns blazing to reach the final.
I think the competition rules state that every team has to play 6 first-team regualrs in the JPT this season, IIRC that Scunthorpe didn't do that last season and got a clip round the ear.
But it would be good to rotate some players for the competition and a game at Wembley at the end sounds very inviting to me!
I can't believe people are even asking this question.
This is a team which thrives on confidence, so every win we get helps us. In recent years we've twice got to the final of this competition, and those runs have inspired us to first safety, and then promotion.
I can't believe people are even asking this question.
This is a team which thrives on confidence, so every win we get helps us. In recent years we've twice got to the final of this competition, and those runs have inspired us to first safety, and then promotion.
I can hear the fans now if, say, Maher or Barrett got injured in a first round tie meaning they miss the next 2 months worth of action...
Michael Simpson tore his cruciate ligaments in his knee in the first round of the JPT last year, he hasn't played since and if it weren't for this 6 first team players rule he never would've played.
Yeah but thats part and parcel of football. Players get injured, thats why you have to make sure there are decent back ups. If we get players that perform really well in cup matches, it may push first teamers out of their place, therefore again creating competition for places which is only a good thing.
But there's a lot of games this year, and 2 other cup competitions. I'm not saying Southend are now the equivalent of Arsenal / Liverpool and should treat it with contempt, just thinking ahead.
I can hear the fans now if, say, Maher or Barrett got injured in a first round tie meaning they miss the next 2 months worth of action...
It didn't seem to be a problem in 2004/05. We had a run of something like 17 unbeaten games in the run-in to the final which took us right into the automatic promotion hunt. That run included 3 or 4 LDV games. It was only once we lost in the final that we started wobbling, yet come the play-off finals we were still strong enough to triumph in extra-time after a 59(?) game season.
Maher or Barrett could get injured at Leeds and miss two months. Should we rest them on Saturday just in case? Hell, they could get injured in a training session that wouldn't be held if we had a mid-week game.
I'd much rather build up confidence with a good run.
I agree with you. Wins breed confidence. Like you say we know how important that is to our team.
Yes last year's cup run may have been an unwelcome distraction to the league but I doubt that we would have survived even if we hadnt had the run.
We should be out to win as much as possible. Im sure no one would be complaining if we ended up at Wembley through the JPT.
Well for what its worth I agree with you, which is why I voted for trying to win it. But I do think, now we have a larger squad and some debate over who's better than who, it's a viable tournament to try things and players out in, which is what the debate was about in the first place really: first team or fringe players...
It's a tough one.
In 2003/04 the run dragged the club up off it's kness, helped generate more support and the confidence gained enabled us to stay up.
In 2004/05 after losing the final we hardly won a game and dropped from top spot to fourth. Had we not reached the final and lost it perhaps we'd have been promoted comfortably? It seemed to have a negative impact.
In 2005/06 we lost to bottom of the Football League club Rushden & Diamonds after fielding a weakened team in the First Round, we then went on to win the title!
In the early rounds I think we should field a mixture of first teamers and reserves, this should enable us to go through, rest a few players and keep squad members happy. At least this year there is a bigger incentive as the Final is staged at Wembley
I agree there was a negative impact in 2004/05, but this was because we lost. Losing burst our bubble of confidence, which is what carried us to the top of the table. Had we lost earlier, then the negative impact would have hit earlier. Had we won that final, I think we would have gone onto win the league. Getting to the final wasn't the problem, losing it was the problem.
Quick quiz question: in our back-to-back promotions, how many games did we win coming off the back of a cup exit?
The final is less of an interest now it's at Wembley, but I'll take a decent run through to the Southern Area final.