MightyShrimper
Coach
only saying whats already been said elsewhere nobend[b said:Quote[/b] (Steve_Clubshop @ Jan. 04 2007,19:20)]whers the yawn smiley face on here when you need one.....
only saying whats already been said elsewhere nobend[b said:Quote[/b] (Steve_Clubshop @ Jan. 04 2007,19:20)]whers the yawn smiley face on here when you need one.....
[b said:Quote[/b] (Mighty Shrimper @ Jan. 04 2007,19:24)]only saying whats already been said elsewhere nobend
LOL... quality![b said:Quote[/b] (* ORM * @ Jan. 04 2007,19:29)][b said:Quote[/b] (Mighty Shrimper @ Jan. 04 2007,19:24)]only saying whats already been said elsewhere nobend
Like this one ?
Tut Tut - racist stereotype![b said:Quote[/b] (Jam_Man @ Jan. 04 2007,17:57)]His family are laying the carpark.[b said:Quote[/b] (Beefy @ Jan. 04 2007,17:56)]Why would Freddy Eastwood going have any impact on us getting a new stadium?!?
[b said:Quote[/b] ]His family are laying the carpark
Dempsey isn't a striker, he typically plays as a winger.[b said:Quote[/b] (pboreham @ Jan. 04 2007,19:40)]Found this on F365 -
"Fulham also hope to tie up a £1.5million deal for US striker Clint Dempsey, 23, after his work permit tribunal hearing was set for next week."
Which you will note what else I wrote about Dempsey playing wide!!![b said:Quote[/b] (chaco27saf @ Jan. 05 2007,07:10)]Dempsey isn't a striker, he typically plays as a winger.[b said:Quote[/b] (pboreham @ Jan. 04 2007,19:40)]Found this on F365 -
"Fulham also hope to tie up a £1.5million deal for US striker Clint Dempsey, 23, after his work permit tribunal hearing was set for next week."
Still an attacking option though, negating the need to spend a further £2.5m[b said:Quote[/b] (pboreham @ Jan. 04 2007,19:40)]...probably Dempsey coming in from a wide position...
Dempsey isn't really the sort of player that would be a threat to keep Freddy out of the side if they did end up playing together, unless Fulham try to convert Dempsey which I doubt because he is too valuable at his current position. I suppose my point is that I don't think the Dempsey signing will have any impact whatsoever on Fulham's desire to pursue Freddy, but that's just my opinion.[b said:Quote[/b] (pboreham @ Jan. 05 2007,07:16)]Which you will note what else I wrote about Dempsey playing wide!!![b said:Quote[/b] (chaco27saf @ Jan. 05 2007,07:10)]Dempsey isn't a striker, he typically plays as a winger.[b said:Quote[/b] (pboreham @ Jan. 04 2007,19:40)]Found this on F365 -
"Fulham also hope to tie up a £1.5million deal for US striker Clint Dempsey, 23, after his work permit tribunal hearing was set for next week."
Still an attacking option though, negating the need to spend a further £2.5m[b said:Quote[/b] (pboreham @ Jan. 04 2007,19:40)]...probably Dempsey coming in from a wide position...
Yup, this is my feeling now.[b said:Quote[/b] (neil @ Jan. 05 2007,09:18)]All the noises are pretty strong at the moment. Bidding a lot of money, which I don't see us making prudently otherwise, is also a good indication that things will move soon. Tomorrow will be the biggest indicator though.
Personally I think it would be in the best interests of the club and the player for him to move on. This is the optimum time to maximise our profit whilst still in the Championship and maintaining our status is dependent on bringing in two or three players of good calibre, the purchase of which can only be financed through selling Eastwood.
He's proved everything he needs to now. A challenge at a higher level and new surroundings will be ideal, especially if he goes to Fulham as they will certainly stay up and he has a good chance of starting a lot of games.
Put like that though, Freddy will struggle to get a game at Fulham won't he?[b said:Quote[/b] (EastStandBlue @ Jan. 05 2007,10:23)]Fulham now have Helguson, McBride and Montella after Collins John leaves. Although Fulham have refuted the Eastwood talk and we say we've had no offers, Id still be extremely surprised if this wasn't Freddy's destination come the end of today, or next week at the latest.