• Welcome to the ShrimperZone forums.
    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which only gives you limited access.

    Existing Users:.
    Please log-in using your existing username and password. If you have any problems, please see below.

    New Users:
    Join our free community now and gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free. Click here to join.

    Fans from other clubs
    We welcome and appreciate supporters from other clubs who wish to engage in sensible discussion. Please feel free to join as above but understand that this is a moderated site and those who cannot play nicely will be quickly removed.

    Assistance Required
    For help with the registration process or accessing your account, please send a note using the Contact us link in the footer, please include your account name. We can then provide you with a new password and verification to get you on the site.

Breaking News Boots & Laces on fire

Almost certainly kids / teens being pillocks. Two fires in the last week set in the fields behind my house, both along the public footpath used by the local school kids. All on the driest and hottest time of the year so far. I know kids will be kids but some of them really are very stupid. Presume it’s the same with B&L.

Arsonists and insurance scammers thank you from the bottom of their bulging pockets
 
Im no rat fan, but i can't see how he'd benefit from burning down Boots and Laces. Surely no sane insurance company is going to pay out for a derelict building that was going to be demolished in the future anyway.

Or am I being naive?
I used to have a tenuous work connection to a fairly well known businessman in South East Essex who shall remain nameless. Said person had apparently been trying for ages to get planning to knock down an existing elderly property he owned, and build a new one on the same plot with no success. One day it unfortunately burned to the ground. Fairly soon after, the new property he wanted was being built. I don't think insurance came into it, but it certainly did him a favour.

I think the gist was, if the old property was gone, it removed the objection to building the new one, or at very least sped things up. No one dared offer a suggestion as to who struck the match..

I have no idea if similar shenanigans have taken place at B&L but these things can happen. Alledgedly.
 
I live near a post-industrial bit of central Birmingham in the middle of being reclaimed and gentrified, and fires in abandoned buildings that currently have stalled planning applications for replacements/conversions to flats are practically a weekly event. People in Manchester, Glasgow and bits of London will tell you the same. Everyone knows what's going on but what can you do?

I'm not making any speculation about current events - we all know that a strong gust of wind could knock that place down. Dodgy electrics, kids mucking around, there are plenty of believable theories. But then, there always are...
 
I live near a post-industrial bit of central Birmingham in the middle of being reclaimed and gentrified, and fires in abandoned buildings that currently have stalled planning applications for replacements/conversions to flats are practically a weekly event. People in Manchester, Glasgow and bits of London will tell you the same. Everyone knows what's going on but what can you do?

I'm not making any speculation about current events - we all know that a strong gust of wind could knock that place down. Dodgy electrics, kids mucking around, there are plenty of believable theories. But then, there always are...
I suspect that empty and abandoned buildings are unlikely to be insured.
 
I used to have a tenuous work connection to a fairly well known businessman in South East Essex who shall remain nameless. Said person had apparently been trying for ages to get planning to knock down an existing elderly property he owned, and build a new one on the same plot with no success. One day it unfortunately burned to the ground. Fairly soon after, the new property he wanted was being built. I don't think insurance came into it, but it certainly did him a favour.

I think the gist was, if the old property was gone, it removed the objection to building the new one, or at very least sped things up. No one dared offer a suggestion as to who struck the match..

I have no idea if similar shenanigans have taken place at B&L but these things can happen. Alledgedly.
But even that isn't relevant here. The rat is pretty much guaranteed planning permission. The only negotiation is around the number, size and type of properties. That decision won't change just because B&L has been burnt down.
 
Just saves the demolition costs 😂, rather than any insurance money.
I know it’s a joke but could it add to demolition costs!
Part of the building may be unstable/ too risky to go in which might dictate a different (more expensive ) approach to demolition- or is it irrelevant?
 
I know it’s a joke but could it add to demolition costs!
Part of the building may be unstable/ too risky to go in which might dictate a different (more expensive ) approach to demolition- or is it irrelevant?
Playing it safe like that we will never win anything, have to take more risks when demolishing the structure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GBJ

ShrimperZone Sponsors

FFM MSPFX Foreign Exchange Services
Estuary Beecham
Andys man club Zone Advertisers Zone Advertisers

ShrimperZone - SUFC Player Sponsorship

Southend United Away Travel


All At Sea Fanzine


Back
Top