Ipswhrimp
F.K.A. Ipshrimp but lost my password....⭐
You're not in the right mindset yet @Richard Hearn.There is only one point that I would take issue with and that is how anyone could conceivably "enjoy" a can of Fosters, half empty or not.
You're not in the right mindset yet @Richard Hearn.There is only one point that I would take issue with and that is how anyone could conceivably "enjoy" a can of Fosters, half empty or not.
I thought his first name was Scott. Still, we did have a Lua-Lua back in the day!What player provided the assist for the Eastleigh goal?.... Quigley. Quigley = Eastleigh sub.![]()
It's a persnal & what I'd call a realistic statement:Notice I said "this season".BTW,I'd be happy to be proved wrong.And there we have it. Is it true that “half glass empty” is too optimistic for you?
Perhaps not, but in the meantime I'm sticking with the meths.You're not in the right mindset yet @Richard Hearn.
Not denying that Maher got it right first half. I make reference to his second half tactical decisions. Up until the finalwhistle that match was in the balance and it shouldn't have been.
Would say the answer is quite simple, we had chances to sew the game up and didn't take them. Eastleigh were always going to up their game in the 2nd half. There will be more games like this I suspect , so enjoy the ride.Spot on and it was a sloppy LCP pass to Gubbins that missed him and continued on to set up the break from which Eastleigh scored. How do we end up hanging on when we were sooo good in the first half? It was a great three points and we deserved the win overall, just, but we're getting a bit saddle sore from riding our luck!!
You have to be careful voicing your opinion in here nowadays or you get stick from the people with opposing views. I understand they have a different view point but why they need to try and mock others, get abusive etc is beyond me. It just causes problems.If I was a hater you'd be spot on. But I'm not. I'm just giving my opinion on something that I watched. Just like I did when against Rochdale away last season I praised Maher for charging it up during the match when we were getting over ran in the first half.
Best way round to answer is reason your POV and stick with it. The 'abusive' usually have other issues.You have to be careful voicing your opinion in here nowadays or you get stick from the people with opposing views. I understand they have a different view point but why they need to try and mock others, get abusive etc is beyond me. It just causes problems.
We had a good win yesterday but it was far from perfect second half. Shows there’s still a lot of room for improvement.
By the same token if you voice an opinion you’ve got to be prepared for people to disagree with it. Sometimes robustly, depending on how provocative the opinion is! There is a bit of mickey taking directed to some of the most ardent Maher-sceptics true, but perhaps that’s also to be expected, especially when they can be so intransigent in their views. Also among many there is a deep sense of gratitude, respect and admiration for Kev and people are going to be prickly about what they perceive as unfair criticism and might even become a bit too defensive of Kev (I definitely fall into the latter camp). There is no doubt that this has been one of most divisive issues ever on SZ. Hopefully it never gets abusive though. We do all support the same team.You have to be careful voicing your opinion in here nowadays or you get stick from the people with opposing views. I understand they have a different view point but why they need to try and mock others, get abusive etc is beyond me. It just causes problems.
We had a good win yesterday but it was far from perfect second half. Shows there’s still a lot of room for improvement.
It’s just not possible to please all of the people all of the time. There’d be moaners even if we were top 2, not liking Kev/the style of play or whatever. If it’s not the manager it’s the ref or the opposition playing too dirty or being a bit better than us. Having a whinge is a British institution and we shouldn’t discourage it. Everyone on here bar the Orient/Col U fans would love to see Southend promoted. Let’s remember that.By the same token if you voice an opinion you’ve got to be prepared for people to disagree with it. Sometimes robustly, depending on how provocative the opinion is! There is a bit of mickey taking directed to some of the most ardent Maher-sceptics true, but perhaps that’s also to be expected, especially when they can be so intransigent in their views. Also among many there is a deep sense of gratitude, respect and admiration for Kev and people are going to be prickly about what they perceive as unfair criticism and might even become a bit too defensive of Kev (I definitely fall into the latter camp). There is no doubt that this has been one of most divisive issues ever on SZ. Hopefully it never gets abusive though. We do all support the same team.
I've watched the replay several times, including the save in slow motion, it hits him and then he moves after the ball has hit him. Right place right time, rather than a save he had no right to get to imho. At the other end we'd be criticising the striker for firing straight at the keeperHayes pulled off a ridiculous save that he had no right to get to.
I’ve no issue with different opinions, but why can’t the pro Maher camp just state they disagree without being for the want of a better term childish about it? Calling people haters etc? What is that going to achieve? Just because you’re pro Maher or anyone else is doesn’t make you anymore correct than someone with an opposing views. Everyone is entitled to their views and they are based on their own experiences as well, but if you don’t like Maher as a manager you either shut up or have to take stick on here nowadays. Is that right?By the same token if you voice an opinion you’ve got to be prepared for people to disagree with it. Sometimes robustly, depending on how provocative the opinion is! There is a bit of mickey taking directed to some of the most ardent Maher-sceptics true, but perhaps that’s also to be expected, especially when they can be so intransigent in their views. Also among many there is a deep sense of gratitude, respect and admiration for Kev and people are going to be prickly about what they perceive as unfair criticism and might even become a bit too defensive of Kev (I definitely fall into the latter camp). There is no doubt that this has been one of most divisive issues ever on SZ. Hopefully it never gets abusive though. We do all support the same team.
I believe you have highlighted a very sailent point in regards to Kev. Many hold a strong bond to him, he is held in high regard for his loyalty and commitment to the Club as player & coach and who's leadership has been vital in the most difficult of times.Also among many there is a deep sense of gratitude, respect and admiration for Kev and people are going to be prickly about what they perceive as unfair criticism and might even become a bit too defensive of Kev
I got stick yesterday on twitter for pointing out that Bridge is uselessI’ve no issue with different opinions, but why can’t the pro Maher camp just state they disagree without being for the want of a better term childish about it? Calling people haters etc? What is that going to achieve? Just because you’re pro Maher or anyone else is doesn’t make you anymore correct than someone with an opposing views. Everyone is entitled to their views and they are based on their own experiences as well, but if you don’t like Maher as a manager you either shut up or have to take stick on here nowadays. Is that right?