Tangled up in Blue
Certified Senior Citizen⭐🦐
Last edited:
Libs in a bit of a panic about being judged by their friends - four years too late
I'm not sure which political commentator made the point, but after the last general election and the formation of the coalition someone did say it could well lead to them having a very bad time of it in 2015.
It looks like whoever it was could well be very right.
Yes, the Lib Dems sold their souls to the devil for a brief period in power.
It's not a tax!
Or did they recognise that they would be far more effective influencing policy as part of the coalition than as the minority voice of parliament that they've always been? No doubt that it will cost them this time around as they'll take all of the blame for any policies that aren't popular with their traditional supporters but none of the credit for anything they did achieve. I'd be curious to see if people thought they could or should have made a different decision at the time?
It came out after the coalition had been formed that the Lib Dems had also been secretly talking to Labour. One of the Lib Dem stipulations was that Gordon Brown had to go, but Labour refused.
A different decision could have been to explore that route further, or not even enter a coalition at all. Note, your question was what different decisions they could have made, it didn't ask for the merits of those decisions.
Or did they recognise that they would be far more effective influencing policy as part of the coalition than as the minority voice of parliament that they've always been? No doubt that it will cost them this time around as they'll take all of the blame for any policies that aren't popular with their traditional supporters but none of the credit for anything they did achieve. I'd be curious to see if people thought they could or should have made a different decision at the time?