Ideal starting line up for Saturday

[seany t]

flavs

francis sodje spinner hammell

mccormack

jcr maher gower

bradbury eastwood


Agree?
Or is it too early to risk Bradbury? Maybe reward Hooper for his good performances of late?

 

[DTS]

Quote[/b] (seany t @ Nov. 21 2006,16:12)]flavs

francis    sodje   spinner   hammell

              mccormack

  jcr            maher          gower

         bradbury    eastwood


Agree?
Or is it too early to risk Bradbury? Maybe reward Hooper for his good performances of late?

Hooper for JCR for me......Other that that I am happy.. .

 

[C C Csiders]

For me (as a tactical one-off) I would go to as near as it is possible to the starting line-up that won 3-0 at the Layerdrome last year. That team knows it has the beating of the Ewes - and the Ewes know that that line-up has the comfortable beating of them.

So: Flahavan - Francis (for Jupp) Sodje, Barrett, Hammell (for Wilson) - Bradbury, Maher, Guttridge, Gower - Eastwood, Harrold (for the Goat)

 

[hexagon_sun]

I bet Clarke starts alongside Efe.

 

[Interpol Shrimper]

Quote[/b] (C C Csiders @ Nov. 21 2006,16:20)]at the Layerdrome

Don't entertain the Ewes that they play at anything other than a non-league ground

Good theory otherwise though, although somehow I feel Harrold lacks the sheer physical presence of The Goat!

 

[Ulysses]

Flavs
Hammell
Prior
Sodje
Francis
JCR
Maher
McCormack
Gower
Harrold
Eastwood

Subs
Barrett
Clarke
Hooper
Cole
Bradbury

 

[Jam_Man]

Quote[/b] (seany t @ Nov. 21 2006,16:12)]flavs

francis    sodje   spinner   hammell

              mccormack

  jcr            maher          gower

         bradbury    eastwood


Agree?
Or is it too early to risk Bradbury? Maybe reward Hooper for his good performances of late?

Right team, wrong formation.

We finally get a midfielder willing to get in the box and you want to play him in a holding role

442 will do fine.

 

[Jam_Man]

Quote[/b] (C C Csiders @ Nov. 21 2006,16:20)]So: Flahavan - Francis (for Jupp) Sodje, Barrett, Hammell (for Wilson) - Bradbury, Maher, Guttridge, Gower - Eastwood, Harrold (for the Goat)

Guttridge ?

Er. No.

 

[Westcliff Shrimper]

Quote[/b] (glasgowsufc @ Nov. 21 2006,16:29)]Good theory otherwise though, although somehow I feel Harrold lacks the sheer physical presence of The Goat!

Spot on - needs to put on half a stone, does our Harry, as he is pushed off the ball far too much. Doesn't hold it up enough either...

 

[C C Csiders]

Quote[/b] (Jam_Man @ Nov. 21 2006,16:42)]

Quote[/b] (C C Csiders @ Nov. 21 2006,16:20)]So: Flahavan - Francis (for Jupp) Sodje, Barrett, Hammell (for Wilson) - Bradbury, Maher, Guttridge, Gower - Eastwood, Harrold (for the Goat)

Guttridge ?

Er. No.

Read the theory.

It's a tactical one-off.

 

[Jam_Man]

Like the theory, but if you use that logic then Wilson for Hamell as well, after all he scored!

 

[Spaceman Spiff]

. Flahavan

Francis     Lucketti    Sodje     Hammell

JCR          Maher   McCormack    Jarvis

             Eastwood Shipperley

 

 

[C C Csiders]

Quote[/b] (Jam_Man @ Nov. 21 2006,16:45)]Like the theory, but if you use that logic then Wilson for Hamell as well, after all he scored!

Hammell for Wilson because I believe Cheese is crocked?

If he isn't he would be in my line-up.

 

[Westcliff Shrimper]

Quote[/b] (C C Csiders @ Nov. 21 2006,16:46)]

Quote[/b] (Jam_Man @ Nov. 21 2006,16:45)]Like the theory, but if you use that logic then Wilson for Hamell as well, after all he scored!

Hammell for Wilson because I believe Cheese is crocked?

If he isn't he would be in my line-up.

I spoke to Che after the Preston game, and he said he is fit to play... ##clique alert##

 

[C C Csiders]

Quote[/b] (CI-City Blue @ Nov. 21 2006,17:03)]

Quote[/b] (C C Csiders @ Nov. 21 2006,16:46)]

Quote[/b] (Jam_Man @ Nov. 21 2006,16:45)]Like the theory, but if you use that logic then Wilson for Hamell as well, after all he scored!

Hammell for Wilson because I believe Cheese is crocked?

If he isn't he would be in my line-up.

I spoke to Che after the Preston game, and he said he is fit to play... ##clique alert##

I'm assuming his crocked again as he wasn't in the reserves today. Unless he is being saved for another heroic goalscoring act at the Ewes.

 

[MC BLUES]

Quote[/b] (CI-City Blue @ Nov. 21 2006,17:03)]

Quote[/b] (C C Csiders @ Nov. 21 2006,16:46)]

Quote[/b] (Jam_Man @ Nov. 21 2006,16:45)]Like the theory, but if you use that logic then Wilson for Hamell as well, after all he scored!

Hammell for Wilson because I believe Cheese is crocked?

If he isn't he would be in my line-up.

I spoke to Che after the Preston game, and he said he is fit to play... ##clique alert##

Che has indeed picked up another injury.

I also hear he may be going out on loan...

 

[I 8 COLU]

Quote[/b] (CI-City Blue @ Nov. 21 2006,16:43)]

Quote[/b] (glasgowsufc @ Nov. 21 2006,16:29)]Good theory otherwise though, although somehow I feel Harrold lacks the sheer physical presence of The Goat!

Spot on - needs to put on half a stone, does our Harry, as he is pushed off the ball far too much.  Doesn't hold it up enough either...

Best he goes out with ricketts for a few meals that should sort it.