Because there isn't much going on and so we are watching where some of our former players are going.[b said:Quote[/b] (Barmy Army @ June 06 2005,16:49)]Why is the official site reporting news of who's interested in Bramble?
He's nout to do with us now, yet two links are on the front page
So, basically, I was right?[b said:Quote[/b] (McScriven @ June 06 2005,17:51)]Because there isn't much going on and so we are watching where some of our former players are going.[b said:Quote[/b] (Barmy Army @ June 06 2005,16:49)]Why is the official site reporting news of who's interested in Bramble?
He's nout to do with us now, yet two links are on the front page
Yes, but I'd imagine most would like to hear transfer news about people who we are trying to bring in to help our club, rather than people who Tilly has decided are not good enough for us.[b said:
Fair enough[b said:Quote[/b] (McScriven @ June 06 2005,16:51)]Because there isn't much going on and so we are watching where some of our former players are going.[b said:Quote[/b] (Barmy Army @ June 06 2005,16:49)]Why is the official site reporting news of who's interested in Bramble?
He's nout to do with us now, yet two links are on the front page
And alert other clubs and agents, causing more competition and the price to be upped...?[b said:
TTK, out of interest:[b said:
Out of interest why are you so anti-Darryl with your stupid little comments??[b said:
Because I believe he has and will continue to cost us goals from poor decision-making and a lack of command of his area.[b said:
Flahavan is a better all round keeper IMHO
I might be wrong about this, but last summer wasn't Tilly set to sign McGleish, but at the last moment Northampton offered him better terms because they knew were interested and almost had a deal done? If that's the case we're better off not declaring interest publically until the player has signed on the dotted line, IMO.[b said:Quote[/b] (Barmy Army @ June 06 2005,17:26)]Well then why not just shut down the official site, as apparently it is not allowed to tell us of possible transfer dealings, and only able to inform us of where our rejects are off to?
But not signing him actually helped us.[b said:Quote[/b] (chaco27saf @ June 06 2005,21:00)]I might be wrong about this, but last summer wasn't Tilly set to sign McGleish, but at the last moment Northampton offered him better terms because they knew were interested and almost had a deal done? If that's the case we're better off not declaring interest publically until the player has signed on the dotted line, IMO.[b said:Quote[/b] (Barmy Army @ June 06 2005,17:26)]Well then why not just shut down the official site, as apparently it is not allowed to tell us of possible transfer dealings, and only able to inform us of where our rejects are off to?
Can't disagree with you there. With signings that never were like that one, it makes me wonder if Eastwood would be here if McGleish came.[b said:Quote[/b] (Barmy Army @ June 06 2005,21:33)]But not signing him actually helped us.[b said:Quote[/b] (chaco27saf @ June 06 2005,21:00)]I might be wrong about this, but last summer wasn't Tilly set to sign McGleish, but at the last moment Northampton offered him better terms because they knew were interested and almost had a deal done? If that's the case we're better off not declaring interest publically until the player has signed on the dotted line, IMO.[b said:Quote[/b] (Barmy Army @ June 06 2005,17:26)]Well then why not just shut down the official site, as apparently it is not allowed to tell us of possible transfer dealings, and only able to inform us of where our rejects are off to?
Double-edged sword and all that
It's really not nuff said.[b said:
